REST API - How to query for links discovery?











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Suppose I have a RESTful HATEOAS API which has /posts endpoint which lists posts with a query shortcut /posts/new. How do I query the API to discover /posts/new?



My ideas:



1) Query /posts and get links from _links attribute (and the entities listed are necessary overhead):



GET /posts

{
"docs": [
...
]
"_links": {
"new": { "rel": "posts", "href": "/posts/new" }
}
}


2) Provide this in the API root together with list of resources:



GET /

{
"resources": {
"posts": {
"_links": {
"self": { "rel": "posts", "href": "/posts" }
"new": { "rel": "posts", "href": "/posts/new" }
}
}
}
}


3) I should not use the /posts/new query and instead use /posts and query params. However, if I change my server logic I would have to change client logic too and that would be serve-client coupling. For example:




  • New messages will be requested by client by somehow providing parameter timestamp > (today - 30)

  • I introduce draft property and change my idea that new are only the posts with timestamp > (today - 30) && draft = false

  • I have to change client to add drafts constraint


Note: posts is just an example I am asking in general.










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    This depends on what representation format the client askes for. As the given samples are similar to HAL JSON I'd keep the _links here on the top-level.
    – Roman Vottner
    Nov 9 at 12:07










  • In spite of my question, does this mean I should discover the alias /posts/new by querying /posts and reading the _links property?
    – SmallhillCZ
    Nov 9 at 13:44










  • Did you consider adding the query parameters to the link returned by the service? This way your option 3 would no longer couple client logic to server logic. The client could blindly use the link (that includes query parameters) regardless of what the service considers to be new.
    – yaccob
    Nov 18 at 0:09















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Suppose I have a RESTful HATEOAS API which has /posts endpoint which lists posts with a query shortcut /posts/new. How do I query the API to discover /posts/new?



My ideas:



1) Query /posts and get links from _links attribute (and the entities listed are necessary overhead):



GET /posts

{
"docs": [
...
]
"_links": {
"new": { "rel": "posts", "href": "/posts/new" }
}
}


2) Provide this in the API root together with list of resources:



GET /

{
"resources": {
"posts": {
"_links": {
"self": { "rel": "posts", "href": "/posts" }
"new": { "rel": "posts", "href": "/posts/new" }
}
}
}
}


3) I should not use the /posts/new query and instead use /posts and query params. However, if I change my server logic I would have to change client logic too and that would be serve-client coupling. For example:




  • New messages will be requested by client by somehow providing parameter timestamp > (today - 30)

  • I introduce draft property and change my idea that new are only the posts with timestamp > (today - 30) && draft = false

  • I have to change client to add drafts constraint


Note: posts is just an example I am asking in general.










share|improve this question




















  • 1




    This depends on what representation format the client askes for. As the given samples are similar to HAL JSON I'd keep the _links here on the top-level.
    – Roman Vottner
    Nov 9 at 12:07










  • In spite of my question, does this mean I should discover the alias /posts/new by querying /posts and reading the _links property?
    – SmallhillCZ
    Nov 9 at 13:44










  • Did you consider adding the query parameters to the link returned by the service? This way your option 3 would no longer couple client logic to server logic. The client could blindly use the link (that includes query parameters) regardless of what the service considers to be new.
    – yaccob
    Nov 18 at 0:09













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Suppose I have a RESTful HATEOAS API which has /posts endpoint which lists posts with a query shortcut /posts/new. How do I query the API to discover /posts/new?



My ideas:



1) Query /posts and get links from _links attribute (and the entities listed are necessary overhead):



GET /posts

{
"docs": [
...
]
"_links": {
"new": { "rel": "posts", "href": "/posts/new" }
}
}


2) Provide this in the API root together with list of resources:



GET /

{
"resources": {
"posts": {
"_links": {
"self": { "rel": "posts", "href": "/posts" }
"new": { "rel": "posts", "href": "/posts/new" }
}
}
}
}


3) I should not use the /posts/new query and instead use /posts and query params. However, if I change my server logic I would have to change client logic too and that would be serve-client coupling. For example:




  • New messages will be requested by client by somehow providing parameter timestamp > (today - 30)

  • I introduce draft property and change my idea that new are only the posts with timestamp > (today - 30) && draft = false

  • I have to change client to add drafts constraint


Note: posts is just an example I am asking in general.










share|improve this question















Suppose I have a RESTful HATEOAS API which has /posts endpoint which lists posts with a query shortcut /posts/new. How do I query the API to discover /posts/new?



My ideas:



1) Query /posts and get links from _links attribute (and the entities listed are necessary overhead):



GET /posts

{
"docs": [
...
]
"_links": {
"new": { "rel": "posts", "href": "/posts/new" }
}
}


2) Provide this in the API root together with list of resources:



GET /

{
"resources": {
"posts": {
"_links": {
"self": { "rel": "posts", "href": "/posts" }
"new": { "rel": "posts", "href": "/posts/new" }
}
}
}
}


3) I should not use the /posts/new query and instead use /posts and query params. However, if I change my server logic I would have to change client logic too and that would be serve-client coupling. For example:




  • New messages will be requested by client by somehow providing parameter timestamp > (today - 30)

  • I introduce draft property and change my idea that new are only the posts with timestamp > (today - 30) && draft = false

  • I have to change client to add drafts constraint


Note: posts is just an example I am asking in general.







rest hateoas






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 9 at 11:34

























asked Nov 9 at 11:11









SmallhillCZ

588




588








  • 1




    This depends on what representation format the client askes for. As the given samples are similar to HAL JSON I'd keep the _links here on the top-level.
    – Roman Vottner
    Nov 9 at 12:07










  • In spite of my question, does this mean I should discover the alias /posts/new by querying /posts and reading the _links property?
    – SmallhillCZ
    Nov 9 at 13:44










  • Did you consider adding the query parameters to the link returned by the service? This way your option 3 would no longer couple client logic to server logic. The client could blindly use the link (that includes query parameters) regardless of what the service considers to be new.
    – yaccob
    Nov 18 at 0:09














  • 1




    This depends on what representation format the client askes for. As the given samples are similar to HAL JSON I'd keep the _links here on the top-level.
    – Roman Vottner
    Nov 9 at 12:07










  • In spite of my question, does this mean I should discover the alias /posts/new by querying /posts and reading the _links property?
    – SmallhillCZ
    Nov 9 at 13:44










  • Did you consider adding the query parameters to the link returned by the service? This way your option 3 would no longer couple client logic to server logic. The client could blindly use the link (that includes query parameters) regardless of what the service considers to be new.
    – yaccob
    Nov 18 at 0:09








1




1




This depends on what representation format the client askes for. As the given samples are similar to HAL JSON I'd keep the _links here on the top-level.
– Roman Vottner
Nov 9 at 12:07




This depends on what representation format the client askes for. As the given samples are similar to HAL JSON I'd keep the _links here on the top-level.
– Roman Vottner
Nov 9 at 12:07












In spite of my question, does this mean I should discover the alias /posts/new by querying /posts and reading the _links property?
– SmallhillCZ
Nov 9 at 13:44




In spite of my question, does this mean I should discover the alias /posts/new by querying /posts and reading the _links property?
– SmallhillCZ
Nov 9 at 13:44












Did you consider adding the query parameters to the link returned by the service? This way your option 3 would no longer couple client logic to server logic. The client could blindly use the link (that includes query parameters) regardless of what the service considers to be new.
– yaccob
Nov 18 at 0:09




Did you consider adding the query parameters to the link returned by the service? This way your option 3 would no longer couple client logic to server logic. The client could blindly use the link (that includes query parameters) regardless of what the service considers to be new.
– yaccob
Nov 18 at 0:09












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













In a REST architecture URIs should be discovered via their accompanying link-relation name. On interpreting your examples above as HAL the URI /post/new has a link-relation name of new. Link relation names provide semantics to URIs which allow clients to determine when to invoke these URIs. HAL is just one of a handful JSON-based media types that support HATEOAS. There are further media-types available that provide a similar job with slightly different syntax and capabilities.



Upon receiving such a document a client would parse the message and build some context for the message containing the actual content including additional metadata like links and further embedded data. If it wants to retrieve the list of the most recent posts it basically needs to look up the key (link-relation name) that expresses the intent (new in your case) from the before-mentioned context in order to retrieve the assigned value (URI). How a client maintains this context is some implementation detail. It might build up a tree-map for easier lookup of "link-relation" keys and their values (URIs) or use some totally different approach.



The knowledge what key to use needs to be present somehow. As link relations express certain semantics they need to be specified somewhere. This can happen in industry standards or media-type definitions. IANA maintains a list of standardized link-relation names and their semantics. On examining the list probably the most likely match according to your specification is current which is defined as




Refers to a resource containing the most recent item(s) in a collection of resources.




I'd therefore propose to change the link-relation name from new to current.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    -1
    down vote













    Well, the whole point of the RESTFUL is to make the links discovery easy by making them correspond to the HTTP method used by the client. That means all your links would be simply named /post, the only thing that would change is the htpp method and the parameters they take, which your server would use to determine the actual operation the client wants.



    This is a sample from a C# project (notice that the links are all the same, the only changes are the HTTP_METHOD and/or the parameter passed):



    enter image description here



    List of common http methods: POST, GET, PUT, DELETE






    share|improve this answer





















    • Yes, but whole point of HATEAOS and REST is that the api is entirely discoverable by links provided and that the client should (in theory) not need anything other, than the entry endpoint. By this there has to be no definition of the API on the client as all the URLs used are provided by the API itself. "[...] if the engine of application state (and hence the API) is not being driven by hypertext, then it cannot be RESTful and cannot be a REST API" (roy.gbiv.com/untangled/2008/rest-apis-must-be-hypertext-driven)
      – SmallhillCZ
      Nov 9 at 13:17










    • Aliases for common queries (as is /posts/new) are then recommended by many. (kennethlange.com/rest-api-checklist, snyxius.com/21-best-practices-designing-launching-restful-api, vinaysahni.com/best-practices-for-a-pragmatic-restful-api)
      – SmallhillCZ
      Nov 9 at 13:20












    • I can't see how this answer addresses the question.
      – yaccob
      Nov 18 at 0:12











    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53224620%2frest-api-how-to-query-for-links-discovery%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    In a REST architecture URIs should be discovered via their accompanying link-relation name. On interpreting your examples above as HAL the URI /post/new has a link-relation name of new. Link relation names provide semantics to URIs which allow clients to determine when to invoke these URIs. HAL is just one of a handful JSON-based media types that support HATEOAS. There are further media-types available that provide a similar job with slightly different syntax and capabilities.



    Upon receiving such a document a client would parse the message and build some context for the message containing the actual content including additional metadata like links and further embedded data. If it wants to retrieve the list of the most recent posts it basically needs to look up the key (link-relation name) that expresses the intent (new in your case) from the before-mentioned context in order to retrieve the assigned value (URI). How a client maintains this context is some implementation detail. It might build up a tree-map for easier lookup of "link-relation" keys and their values (URIs) or use some totally different approach.



    The knowledge what key to use needs to be present somehow. As link relations express certain semantics they need to be specified somewhere. This can happen in industry standards or media-type definitions. IANA maintains a list of standardized link-relation names and their semantics. On examining the list probably the most likely match according to your specification is current which is defined as




    Refers to a resource containing the most recent item(s) in a collection of resources.




    I'd therefore propose to change the link-relation name from new to current.






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      In a REST architecture URIs should be discovered via their accompanying link-relation name. On interpreting your examples above as HAL the URI /post/new has a link-relation name of new. Link relation names provide semantics to URIs which allow clients to determine when to invoke these URIs. HAL is just one of a handful JSON-based media types that support HATEOAS. There are further media-types available that provide a similar job with slightly different syntax and capabilities.



      Upon receiving such a document a client would parse the message and build some context for the message containing the actual content including additional metadata like links and further embedded data. If it wants to retrieve the list of the most recent posts it basically needs to look up the key (link-relation name) that expresses the intent (new in your case) from the before-mentioned context in order to retrieve the assigned value (URI). How a client maintains this context is some implementation detail. It might build up a tree-map for easier lookup of "link-relation" keys and their values (URIs) or use some totally different approach.



      The knowledge what key to use needs to be present somehow. As link relations express certain semantics they need to be specified somewhere. This can happen in industry standards or media-type definitions. IANA maintains a list of standardized link-relation names and their semantics. On examining the list probably the most likely match according to your specification is current which is defined as




      Refers to a resource containing the most recent item(s) in a collection of resources.




      I'd therefore propose to change the link-relation name from new to current.






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        In a REST architecture URIs should be discovered via their accompanying link-relation name. On interpreting your examples above as HAL the URI /post/new has a link-relation name of new. Link relation names provide semantics to URIs which allow clients to determine when to invoke these URIs. HAL is just one of a handful JSON-based media types that support HATEOAS. There are further media-types available that provide a similar job with slightly different syntax and capabilities.



        Upon receiving such a document a client would parse the message and build some context for the message containing the actual content including additional metadata like links and further embedded data. If it wants to retrieve the list of the most recent posts it basically needs to look up the key (link-relation name) that expresses the intent (new in your case) from the before-mentioned context in order to retrieve the assigned value (URI). How a client maintains this context is some implementation detail. It might build up a tree-map for easier lookup of "link-relation" keys and their values (URIs) or use some totally different approach.



        The knowledge what key to use needs to be present somehow. As link relations express certain semantics they need to be specified somewhere. This can happen in industry standards or media-type definitions. IANA maintains a list of standardized link-relation names and their semantics. On examining the list probably the most likely match according to your specification is current which is defined as




        Refers to a resource containing the most recent item(s) in a collection of resources.




        I'd therefore propose to change the link-relation name from new to current.






        share|improve this answer












        In a REST architecture URIs should be discovered via their accompanying link-relation name. On interpreting your examples above as HAL the URI /post/new has a link-relation name of new. Link relation names provide semantics to URIs which allow clients to determine when to invoke these URIs. HAL is just one of a handful JSON-based media types that support HATEOAS. There are further media-types available that provide a similar job with slightly different syntax and capabilities.



        Upon receiving such a document a client would parse the message and build some context for the message containing the actual content including additional metadata like links and further embedded data. If it wants to retrieve the list of the most recent posts it basically needs to look up the key (link-relation name) that expresses the intent (new in your case) from the before-mentioned context in order to retrieve the assigned value (URI). How a client maintains this context is some implementation detail. It might build up a tree-map for easier lookup of "link-relation" keys and their values (URIs) or use some totally different approach.



        The knowledge what key to use needs to be present somehow. As link relations express certain semantics they need to be specified somewhere. This can happen in industry standards or media-type definitions. IANA maintains a list of standardized link-relation names and their semantics. On examining the list probably the most likely match according to your specification is current which is defined as




        Refers to a resource containing the most recent item(s) in a collection of resources.




        I'd therefore propose to change the link-relation name from new to current.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 9 at 15:48









        Roman Vottner

        5,48112436




        5,48112436
























            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            Well, the whole point of the RESTFUL is to make the links discovery easy by making them correspond to the HTTP method used by the client. That means all your links would be simply named /post, the only thing that would change is the htpp method and the parameters they take, which your server would use to determine the actual operation the client wants.



            This is a sample from a C# project (notice that the links are all the same, the only changes are the HTTP_METHOD and/or the parameter passed):



            enter image description here



            List of common http methods: POST, GET, PUT, DELETE






            share|improve this answer





















            • Yes, but whole point of HATEAOS and REST is that the api is entirely discoverable by links provided and that the client should (in theory) not need anything other, than the entry endpoint. By this there has to be no definition of the API on the client as all the URLs used are provided by the API itself. "[...] if the engine of application state (and hence the API) is not being driven by hypertext, then it cannot be RESTful and cannot be a REST API" (roy.gbiv.com/untangled/2008/rest-apis-must-be-hypertext-driven)
              – SmallhillCZ
              Nov 9 at 13:17










            • Aliases for common queries (as is /posts/new) are then recommended by many. (kennethlange.com/rest-api-checklist, snyxius.com/21-best-practices-designing-launching-restful-api, vinaysahni.com/best-practices-for-a-pragmatic-restful-api)
              – SmallhillCZ
              Nov 9 at 13:20












            • I can't see how this answer addresses the question.
              – yaccob
              Nov 18 at 0:12















            up vote
            -1
            down vote













            Well, the whole point of the RESTFUL is to make the links discovery easy by making them correspond to the HTTP method used by the client. That means all your links would be simply named /post, the only thing that would change is the htpp method and the parameters they take, which your server would use to determine the actual operation the client wants.



            This is a sample from a C# project (notice that the links are all the same, the only changes are the HTTP_METHOD and/or the parameter passed):



            enter image description here



            List of common http methods: POST, GET, PUT, DELETE






            share|improve this answer





















            • Yes, but whole point of HATEAOS and REST is that the api is entirely discoverable by links provided and that the client should (in theory) not need anything other, than the entry endpoint. By this there has to be no definition of the API on the client as all the URLs used are provided by the API itself. "[...] if the engine of application state (and hence the API) is not being driven by hypertext, then it cannot be RESTful and cannot be a REST API" (roy.gbiv.com/untangled/2008/rest-apis-must-be-hypertext-driven)
              – SmallhillCZ
              Nov 9 at 13:17










            • Aliases for common queries (as is /posts/new) are then recommended by many. (kennethlange.com/rest-api-checklist, snyxius.com/21-best-practices-designing-launching-restful-api, vinaysahni.com/best-practices-for-a-pragmatic-restful-api)
              – SmallhillCZ
              Nov 9 at 13:20












            • I can't see how this answer addresses the question.
              – yaccob
              Nov 18 at 0:12













            up vote
            -1
            down vote










            up vote
            -1
            down vote









            Well, the whole point of the RESTFUL is to make the links discovery easy by making them correspond to the HTTP method used by the client. That means all your links would be simply named /post, the only thing that would change is the htpp method and the parameters they take, which your server would use to determine the actual operation the client wants.



            This is a sample from a C# project (notice that the links are all the same, the only changes are the HTTP_METHOD and/or the parameter passed):



            enter image description here



            List of common http methods: POST, GET, PUT, DELETE






            share|improve this answer












            Well, the whole point of the RESTFUL is to make the links discovery easy by making them correspond to the HTTP method used by the client. That means all your links would be simply named /post, the only thing that would change is the htpp method and the parameters they take, which your server would use to determine the actual operation the client wants.



            This is a sample from a C# project (notice that the links are all the same, the only changes are the HTTP_METHOD and/or the parameter passed):



            enter image description here



            List of common http methods: POST, GET, PUT, DELETE







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 9 at 11:47









            WoF_Angel

            1,22682245




            1,22682245












            • Yes, but whole point of HATEAOS and REST is that the api is entirely discoverable by links provided and that the client should (in theory) not need anything other, than the entry endpoint. By this there has to be no definition of the API on the client as all the URLs used are provided by the API itself. "[...] if the engine of application state (and hence the API) is not being driven by hypertext, then it cannot be RESTful and cannot be a REST API" (roy.gbiv.com/untangled/2008/rest-apis-must-be-hypertext-driven)
              – SmallhillCZ
              Nov 9 at 13:17










            • Aliases for common queries (as is /posts/new) are then recommended by many. (kennethlange.com/rest-api-checklist, snyxius.com/21-best-practices-designing-launching-restful-api, vinaysahni.com/best-practices-for-a-pragmatic-restful-api)
              – SmallhillCZ
              Nov 9 at 13:20












            • I can't see how this answer addresses the question.
              – yaccob
              Nov 18 at 0:12


















            • Yes, but whole point of HATEAOS and REST is that the api is entirely discoverable by links provided and that the client should (in theory) not need anything other, than the entry endpoint. By this there has to be no definition of the API on the client as all the URLs used are provided by the API itself. "[...] if the engine of application state (and hence the API) is not being driven by hypertext, then it cannot be RESTful and cannot be a REST API" (roy.gbiv.com/untangled/2008/rest-apis-must-be-hypertext-driven)
              – SmallhillCZ
              Nov 9 at 13:17










            • Aliases for common queries (as is /posts/new) are then recommended by many. (kennethlange.com/rest-api-checklist, snyxius.com/21-best-practices-designing-launching-restful-api, vinaysahni.com/best-practices-for-a-pragmatic-restful-api)
              – SmallhillCZ
              Nov 9 at 13:20












            • I can't see how this answer addresses the question.
              – yaccob
              Nov 18 at 0:12
















            Yes, but whole point of HATEAOS and REST is that the api is entirely discoverable by links provided and that the client should (in theory) not need anything other, than the entry endpoint. By this there has to be no definition of the API on the client as all the URLs used are provided by the API itself. "[...] if the engine of application state (and hence the API) is not being driven by hypertext, then it cannot be RESTful and cannot be a REST API" (roy.gbiv.com/untangled/2008/rest-apis-must-be-hypertext-driven)
            – SmallhillCZ
            Nov 9 at 13:17




            Yes, but whole point of HATEAOS and REST is that the api is entirely discoverable by links provided and that the client should (in theory) not need anything other, than the entry endpoint. By this there has to be no definition of the API on the client as all the URLs used are provided by the API itself. "[...] if the engine of application state (and hence the API) is not being driven by hypertext, then it cannot be RESTful and cannot be a REST API" (roy.gbiv.com/untangled/2008/rest-apis-must-be-hypertext-driven)
            – SmallhillCZ
            Nov 9 at 13:17












            Aliases for common queries (as is /posts/new) are then recommended by many. (kennethlange.com/rest-api-checklist, snyxius.com/21-best-practices-designing-launching-restful-api, vinaysahni.com/best-practices-for-a-pragmatic-restful-api)
            – SmallhillCZ
            Nov 9 at 13:20






            Aliases for common queries (as is /posts/new) are then recommended by many. (kennethlange.com/rest-api-checklist, snyxius.com/21-best-practices-designing-launching-restful-api, vinaysahni.com/best-practices-for-a-pragmatic-restful-api)
            – SmallhillCZ
            Nov 9 at 13:20














            I can't see how this answer addresses the question.
            – yaccob
            Nov 18 at 0:12




            I can't see how this answer addresses the question.
            – yaccob
            Nov 18 at 0:12


















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53224620%2frest-api-how-to-query-for-links-discovery%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            鏡平學校

            ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

            Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?