Stop Jinja2 Execution With IF Statement?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have some code like:



{% if key_var is not none %}
{{ my_list[key_var] }}
{% endif %}


However, I'm getting an error:



jinja2.exceptions.UndefinedError: 'list object' has no attribute 'None'


Is there a way to get Jinja2 to not run the code if the IF statement is false? Or am I missing something else?



Thank you for your help :)










share|improve this question
























  • Why not {% if key_var %} and leave it at that?
    – dfundako
    Nov 8 at 18:20












  • That snippet works for me on the latest Jinja2 (2.10). What version of Jinja2 are you using? And are you sure that that fragment is the culprit?
    – Dave W. Smith
    Nov 8 at 18:35










  • @dfundako Because zero would do the wrong thing
    – Dave W. Smith
    Nov 8 at 18:38










  • I'm using Jinja2 2.9.6. I'll see if I can upgrade to 2.10.
    – VFR292
    Nov 9 at 3:32















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have some code like:



{% if key_var is not none %}
{{ my_list[key_var] }}
{% endif %}


However, I'm getting an error:



jinja2.exceptions.UndefinedError: 'list object' has no attribute 'None'


Is there a way to get Jinja2 to not run the code if the IF statement is false? Or am I missing something else?



Thank you for your help :)










share|improve this question
























  • Why not {% if key_var %} and leave it at that?
    – dfundako
    Nov 8 at 18:20












  • That snippet works for me on the latest Jinja2 (2.10). What version of Jinja2 are you using? And are you sure that that fragment is the culprit?
    – Dave W. Smith
    Nov 8 at 18:35










  • @dfundako Because zero would do the wrong thing
    – Dave W. Smith
    Nov 8 at 18:38










  • I'm using Jinja2 2.9.6. I'll see if I can upgrade to 2.10.
    – VFR292
    Nov 9 at 3:32













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have some code like:



{% if key_var is not none %}
{{ my_list[key_var] }}
{% endif %}


However, I'm getting an error:



jinja2.exceptions.UndefinedError: 'list object' has no attribute 'None'


Is there a way to get Jinja2 to not run the code if the IF statement is false? Or am I missing something else?



Thank you for your help :)










share|improve this question















I have some code like:



{% if key_var is not none %}
{{ my_list[key_var] }}
{% endif %}


However, I'm getting an error:



jinja2.exceptions.UndefinedError: 'list object' has no attribute 'None'


Is there a way to get Jinja2 to not run the code if the IF statement is false? Or am I missing something else?



Thank you for your help :)







django flask jinja2






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 8 at 18:17

























asked Nov 8 at 17:47









VFR292

1314




1314












  • Why not {% if key_var %} and leave it at that?
    – dfundako
    Nov 8 at 18:20












  • That snippet works for me on the latest Jinja2 (2.10). What version of Jinja2 are you using? And are you sure that that fragment is the culprit?
    – Dave W. Smith
    Nov 8 at 18:35










  • @dfundako Because zero would do the wrong thing
    – Dave W. Smith
    Nov 8 at 18:38










  • I'm using Jinja2 2.9.6. I'll see if I can upgrade to 2.10.
    – VFR292
    Nov 9 at 3:32


















  • Why not {% if key_var %} and leave it at that?
    – dfundako
    Nov 8 at 18:20












  • That snippet works for me on the latest Jinja2 (2.10). What version of Jinja2 are you using? And are you sure that that fragment is the culprit?
    – Dave W. Smith
    Nov 8 at 18:35










  • @dfundako Because zero would do the wrong thing
    – Dave W. Smith
    Nov 8 at 18:38










  • I'm using Jinja2 2.9.6. I'll see if I can upgrade to 2.10.
    – VFR292
    Nov 9 at 3:32
















Why not {% if key_var %} and leave it at that?
– dfundako
Nov 8 at 18:20






Why not {% if key_var %} and leave it at that?
– dfundako
Nov 8 at 18:20














That snippet works for me on the latest Jinja2 (2.10). What version of Jinja2 are you using? And are you sure that that fragment is the culprit?
– Dave W. Smith
Nov 8 at 18:35




That snippet works for me on the latest Jinja2 (2.10). What version of Jinja2 are you using? And are you sure that that fragment is the culprit?
– Dave W. Smith
Nov 8 at 18:35












@dfundako Because zero would do the wrong thing
– Dave W. Smith
Nov 8 at 18:38




@dfundako Because zero would do the wrong thing
– Dave W. Smith
Nov 8 at 18:38












I'm using Jinja2 2.9.6. I'll see if I can upgrade to 2.10.
– VFR292
Nov 9 at 3:32




I'm using Jinja2 2.9.6. I'll see if I can upgrade to 2.10.
– VFR292
Nov 9 at 3:32












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













{% if my_list[key_var] is defined %}
{{ my_list[key_var] }}
{% endif %}


Got the behavior I was looking for. I didn't want my_list[key_var] to run inside of the IF statement when the key_var is None



I don't know why this worked when my original attempt didn't. If anyone knows, please fill me in.



Thank you!






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53213432%2fstop-jinja2-execution-with-if-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    {% if my_list[key_var] is defined %}
    {{ my_list[key_var] }}
    {% endif %}


    Got the behavior I was looking for. I didn't want my_list[key_var] to run inside of the IF statement when the key_var is None



    I don't know why this worked when my original attempt didn't. If anyone knows, please fill me in.



    Thank you!






    share|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      {% if my_list[key_var] is defined %}
      {{ my_list[key_var] }}
      {% endif %}


      Got the behavior I was looking for. I didn't want my_list[key_var] to run inside of the IF statement when the key_var is None



      I don't know why this worked when my original attempt didn't. If anyone knows, please fill me in.



      Thank you!






      share|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        {% if my_list[key_var] is defined %}
        {{ my_list[key_var] }}
        {% endif %}


        Got the behavior I was looking for. I didn't want my_list[key_var] to run inside of the IF statement when the key_var is None



        I don't know why this worked when my original attempt didn't. If anyone knows, please fill me in.



        Thank you!






        share|improve this answer












        {% if my_list[key_var] is defined %}
        {{ my_list[key_var] }}
        {% endif %}


        Got the behavior I was looking for. I didn't want my_list[key_var] to run inside of the IF statement when the key_var is None



        I don't know why this worked when my original attempt didn't. If anyone knows, please fill me in.



        Thank you!







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 9 at 4:06









        VFR292

        1314




        1314






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53213432%2fstop-jinja2-execution-with-if-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            鏡平學校

            ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

            Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?