LMAX's disruptor. How to define multi EventHandlerGroup?












-1















I want to handle different event with multi-EventHandleGroup?I can't find example with that.thanks...
it's the code:



  executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(threadPoolSize);
disruptor = new Disruptor<>(new DefaultEventFactory(),
ringBufferSize, executorService
, ProducerType.SINGLE, new BlockingWaitStrategy());
EventHandlerGroup<OrderEvent> orderEventEventHandlerGroup =
disruptor.handleEventsWith(
new OrderEventHandle(rabbitTemplate));
orderEventEventHandlerGroup.then(new
MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());


I want to add another event and I want to handle it with another EventHandleGroup like:



cancelEventDisruptor.handleEventsWith(new 
CancelOrderHandle()).then(new MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());









share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Please add more details to your question.

    – Busy Bee
    Nov 19 '18 at 7:02











  • Hi and welcome to SO. Please edit the question to show what you've tried. Like this we will be able to better understand your problem/question and thus we will be able to better help you. It is best to provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. For more information, please see How to Ask and take the Tour.

    – quant
    Nov 19 '18 at 7:14











  • I have update it.thanks

    – 刘德华
    Nov 19 '18 at 7:58
















-1















I want to handle different event with multi-EventHandleGroup?I can't find example with that.thanks...
it's the code:



  executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(threadPoolSize);
disruptor = new Disruptor<>(new DefaultEventFactory(),
ringBufferSize, executorService
, ProducerType.SINGLE, new BlockingWaitStrategy());
EventHandlerGroup<OrderEvent> orderEventEventHandlerGroup =
disruptor.handleEventsWith(
new OrderEventHandle(rabbitTemplate));
orderEventEventHandlerGroup.then(new
MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());


I want to add another event and I want to handle it with another EventHandleGroup like:



cancelEventDisruptor.handleEventsWith(new 
CancelOrderHandle()).then(new MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());









share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Please add more details to your question.

    – Busy Bee
    Nov 19 '18 at 7:02











  • Hi and welcome to SO. Please edit the question to show what you've tried. Like this we will be able to better understand your problem/question and thus we will be able to better help you. It is best to provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. For more information, please see How to Ask and take the Tour.

    – quant
    Nov 19 '18 at 7:14











  • I have update it.thanks

    – 刘德华
    Nov 19 '18 at 7:58














-1












-1








-1








I want to handle different event with multi-EventHandleGroup?I can't find example with that.thanks...
it's the code:



  executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(threadPoolSize);
disruptor = new Disruptor<>(new DefaultEventFactory(),
ringBufferSize, executorService
, ProducerType.SINGLE, new BlockingWaitStrategy());
EventHandlerGroup<OrderEvent> orderEventEventHandlerGroup =
disruptor.handleEventsWith(
new OrderEventHandle(rabbitTemplate));
orderEventEventHandlerGroup.then(new
MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());


I want to add another event and I want to handle it with another EventHandleGroup like:



cancelEventDisruptor.handleEventsWith(new 
CancelOrderHandle()).then(new MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());









share|improve this question
















I want to handle different event with multi-EventHandleGroup?I can't find example with that.thanks...
it's the code:



  executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(threadPoolSize);
disruptor = new Disruptor<>(new DefaultEventFactory(),
ringBufferSize, executorService
, ProducerType.SINGLE, new BlockingWaitStrategy());
EventHandlerGroup<OrderEvent> orderEventEventHandlerGroup =
disruptor.handleEventsWith(
new OrderEventHandle(rabbitTemplate));
orderEventEventHandlerGroup.then(new
MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());


I want to add another event and I want to handle it with another EventHandleGroup like:



cancelEventDisruptor.handleEventsWith(new 
CancelOrderHandle()).then(new MoveEventFromProcessing(redisService))
.then(new EventClearHandle());






java disruptor-pattern lmax






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 19 '18 at 7:57







刘德华

















asked Nov 19 '18 at 6:53









刘德华刘德华

11




11








  • 1





    Please add more details to your question.

    – Busy Bee
    Nov 19 '18 at 7:02











  • Hi and welcome to SO. Please edit the question to show what you've tried. Like this we will be able to better understand your problem/question and thus we will be able to better help you. It is best to provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. For more information, please see How to Ask and take the Tour.

    – quant
    Nov 19 '18 at 7:14











  • I have update it.thanks

    – 刘德华
    Nov 19 '18 at 7:58














  • 1





    Please add more details to your question.

    – Busy Bee
    Nov 19 '18 at 7:02











  • Hi and welcome to SO. Please edit the question to show what you've tried. Like this we will be able to better understand your problem/question and thus we will be able to better help you. It is best to provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. For more information, please see How to Ask and take the Tour.

    – quant
    Nov 19 '18 at 7:14











  • I have update it.thanks

    – 刘德华
    Nov 19 '18 at 7:58








1




1





Please add more details to your question.

– Busy Bee
Nov 19 '18 at 7:02





Please add more details to your question.

– Busy Bee
Nov 19 '18 at 7:02













Hi and welcome to SO. Please edit the question to show what you've tried. Like this we will be able to better understand your problem/question and thus we will be able to better help you. It is best to provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. For more information, please see How to Ask and take the Tour.

– quant
Nov 19 '18 at 7:14





Hi and welcome to SO. Please edit the question to show what you've tried. Like this we will be able to better understand your problem/question and thus we will be able to better help you. It is best to provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example. For more information, please see How to Ask and take the Tour.

– quant
Nov 19 '18 at 7:14













I have update it.thanks

– 刘德华
Nov 19 '18 at 7:58





I have update it.thanks

– 刘德华
Nov 19 '18 at 7:58












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














All eventHandlers see all messages. To achieve what you are looking for your OrderEventHandle and CancelOrderHandle need to be able to establish the type of event seen and ignore the ones which do not apply to them.



In the example code you are also setting up two complete handling chains. You would be better advised to have a single MoveEventFromProcessing gated (see SequenceBarrier) on both the OrderEventHandle and CancelOrderHandle and then gate the EventClearHandle on that. So the topology would look like



Producer -> RB -> OrderEventHandle -> MoveEventFromProcessing -> EventClearHandle
-> CancelEventHandle /






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    });
    });
    }, "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53369651%2flmaxs-disruptor-how-to-define-multi-eventhandlergroup%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    All eventHandlers see all messages. To achieve what you are looking for your OrderEventHandle and CancelOrderHandle need to be able to establish the type of event seen and ignore the ones which do not apply to them.



    In the example code you are also setting up two complete handling chains. You would be better advised to have a single MoveEventFromProcessing gated (see SequenceBarrier) on both the OrderEventHandle and CancelOrderHandle and then gate the EventClearHandle on that. So the topology would look like



    Producer -> RB -> OrderEventHandle -> MoveEventFromProcessing -> EventClearHandle
    -> CancelEventHandle /






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      All eventHandlers see all messages. To achieve what you are looking for your OrderEventHandle and CancelOrderHandle need to be able to establish the type of event seen and ignore the ones which do not apply to them.



      In the example code you are also setting up two complete handling chains. You would be better advised to have a single MoveEventFromProcessing gated (see SequenceBarrier) on both the OrderEventHandle and CancelOrderHandle and then gate the EventClearHandle on that. So the topology would look like



      Producer -> RB -> OrderEventHandle -> MoveEventFromProcessing -> EventClearHandle
      -> CancelEventHandle /






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        All eventHandlers see all messages. To achieve what you are looking for your OrderEventHandle and CancelOrderHandle need to be able to establish the type of event seen and ignore the ones which do not apply to them.



        In the example code you are also setting up two complete handling chains. You would be better advised to have a single MoveEventFromProcessing gated (see SequenceBarrier) on both the OrderEventHandle and CancelOrderHandle and then gate the EventClearHandle on that. So the topology would look like



        Producer -> RB -> OrderEventHandle -> MoveEventFromProcessing -> EventClearHandle
        -> CancelEventHandle /






        share|improve this answer













        All eventHandlers see all messages. To achieve what you are looking for your OrderEventHandle and CancelOrderHandle need to be able to establish the type of event seen and ignore the ones which do not apply to them.



        In the example code you are also setting up two complete handling chains. You would be better advised to have a single MoveEventFromProcessing gated (see SequenceBarrier) on both the OrderEventHandle and CancelOrderHandle and then gate the EventClearHandle on that. So the topology would look like



        Producer -> RB -> OrderEventHandle -> MoveEventFromProcessing -> EventClearHandle
        -> CancelEventHandle /







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 20 '18 at 12:00









        Sam Turtel BarkerSam Turtel Barker

        775616




        775616






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53369651%2flmaxs-disruptor-how-to-define-multi-eventhandlergroup%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            鏡平學校

            ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

            Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?