Mapped Type For Optional Arguments












2















interface Foo{
one: string;
two?: number;
someFunc: (args: string|number) => string
}


So, what i am looking for is a way to declare the type for 'args';



I was wondering if there was a way to specify the type for args.The paramater 'two' is optional. In case the user specifies the parameter 'two', i want someFunc to have args as number and string other wise, is there a way of doing this except using union type.



Thanks.










share|improve this question



























    2















    interface Foo{
    one: string;
    two?: number;
    someFunc: (args: string|number) => string
    }


    So, what i am looking for is a way to declare the type for 'args';



    I was wondering if there was a way to specify the type for args.The paramater 'two' is optional. In case the user specifies the parameter 'two', i want someFunc to have args as number and string other wise, is there a way of doing this except using union type.



    Thanks.










    share|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2








      interface Foo{
      one: string;
      two?: number;
      someFunc: (args: string|number) => string
      }


      So, what i am looking for is a way to declare the type for 'args';



      I was wondering if there was a way to specify the type for args.The paramater 'two' is optional. In case the user specifies the parameter 'two', i want someFunc to have args as number and string other wise, is there a way of doing this except using union type.



      Thanks.










      share|improve this question














      interface Foo{
      one: string;
      two?: number;
      someFunc: (args: string|number) => string
      }


      So, what i am looking for is a way to declare the type for 'args';



      I was wondering if there was a way to specify the type for args.The paramater 'two' is optional. In case the user specifies the parameter 'two', i want someFunc to have args as number and string other wise, is there a way of doing this except using union type.



      Thanks.







      typescript typescript-typings






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 19 '18 at 4:19









      Amol GuptaAmol Gupta

      648




      648
























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          You can use a union instead of the interface. One union member will have two required an if type number, and have the appropriate type for args, the other member of the union will have twooptional and of type never to ensure its not compatible with the other union member. You will loose inference for the argument type, but the compiler will validate that the function does have the appropriate parameter type.



          type Foo = {
          one: string;
          two?: never;
          someFunc: (args: number) => string
          } | {
          one: string;
          two: number;
          someFunc: (args: string) => string
          }

          let foo: Foo = {
          one: '',
          someFunc : (a: string) => a
          } // err

          let foo2: Foo = {
          one: '',
          someFunc : (a: number) => a.toString()
          } // ok

          let foo3: Foo = {
          one: '',
          two:2,
          someFunc : (a: string) => a
          } // ok

          let foo4: Foo = {
          one: '',
          two:3
          someFunc : (a: number) => a.toString()
          } // err





          share|improve this answer
























          • Great Thanks. Works Great.

            – Amol Gupta
            Nov 19 '18 at 6:08



















          2














          You want:



          type Foo =
          | {one: string, two: number, someFunc(args: string): string}
          | {one: string, someFunc(args: number): string}





          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks For all the help bcherny appreciate it.

            – Amol Gupta
            Nov 19 '18 at 6:09











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53368260%2fmapped-type-for-optional-arguments%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          You can use a union instead of the interface. One union member will have two required an if type number, and have the appropriate type for args, the other member of the union will have twooptional and of type never to ensure its not compatible with the other union member. You will loose inference for the argument type, but the compiler will validate that the function does have the appropriate parameter type.



          type Foo = {
          one: string;
          two?: never;
          someFunc: (args: number) => string
          } | {
          one: string;
          two: number;
          someFunc: (args: string) => string
          }

          let foo: Foo = {
          one: '',
          someFunc : (a: string) => a
          } // err

          let foo2: Foo = {
          one: '',
          someFunc : (a: number) => a.toString()
          } // ok

          let foo3: Foo = {
          one: '',
          two:2,
          someFunc : (a: string) => a
          } // ok

          let foo4: Foo = {
          one: '',
          two:3
          someFunc : (a: number) => a.toString()
          } // err





          share|improve this answer
























          • Great Thanks. Works Great.

            – Amol Gupta
            Nov 19 '18 at 6:08
















          2














          You can use a union instead of the interface. One union member will have two required an if type number, and have the appropriate type for args, the other member of the union will have twooptional and of type never to ensure its not compatible with the other union member. You will loose inference for the argument type, but the compiler will validate that the function does have the appropriate parameter type.



          type Foo = {
          one: string;
          two?: never;
          someFunc: (args: number) => string
          } | {
          one: string;
          two: number;
          someFunc: (args: string) => string
          }

          let foo: Foo = {
          one: '',
          someFunc : (a: string) => a
          } // err

          let foo2: Foo = {
          one: '',
          someFunc : (a: number) => a.toString()
          } // ok

          let foo3: Foo = {
          one: '',
          two:2,
          someFunc : (a: string) => a
          } // ok

          let foo4: Foo = {
          one: '',
          two:3
          someFunc : (a: number) => a.toString()
          } // err





          share|improve this answer
























          • Great Thanks. Works Great.

            – Amol Gupta
            Nov 19 '18 at 6:08














          2












          2








          2







          You can use a union instead of the interface. One union member will have two required an if type number, and have the appropriate type for args, the other member of the union will have twooptional and of type never to ensure its not compatible with the other union member. You will loose inference for the argument type, but the compiler will validate that the function does have the appropriate parameter type.



          type Foo = {
          one: string;
          two?: never;
          someFunc: (args: number) => string
          } | {
          one: string;
          two: number;
          someFunc: (args: string) => string
          }

          let foo: Foo = {
          one: '',
          someFunc : (a: string) => a
          } // err

          let foo2: Foo = {
          one: '',
          someFunc : (a: number) => a.toString()
          } // ok

          let foo3: Foo = {
          one: '',
          two:2,
          someFunc : (a: string) => a
          } // ok

          let foo4: Foo = {
          one: '',
          two:3
          someFunc : (a: number) => a.toString()
          } // err





          share|improve this answer













          You can use a union instead of the interface. One union member will have two required an if type number, and have the appropriate type for args, the other member of the union will have twooptional and of type never to ensure its not compatible with the other union member. You will loose inference for the argument type, but the compiler will validate that the function does have the appropriate parameter type.



          type Foo = {
          one: string;
          two?: never;
          someFunc: (args: number) => string
          } | {
          one: string;
          two: number;
          someFunc: (args: string) => string
          }

          let foo: Foo = {
          one: '',
          someFunc : (a: string) => a
          } // err

          let foo2: Foo = {
          one: '',
          someFunc : (a: number) => a.toString()
          } // ok

          let foo3: Foo = {
          one: '',
          two:2,
          someFunc : (a: string) => a
          } // ok

          let foo4: Foo = {
          one: '',
          two:3
          someFunc : (a: number) => a.toString()
          } // err






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 19 '18 at 5:28









          Titian Cernicova-DragomirTitian Cernicova-Dragomir

          61.1k33755




          61.1k33755













          • Great Thanks. Works Great.

            – Amol Gupta
            Nov 19 '18 at 6:08



















          • Great Thanks. Works Great.

            – Amol Gupta
            Nov 19 '18 at 6:08

















          Great Thanks. Works Great.

          – Amol Gupta
          Nov 19 '18 at 6:08





          Great Thanks. Works Great.

          – Amol Gupta
          Nov 19 '18 at 6:08













          2














          You want:



          type Foo =
          | {one: string, two: number, someFunc(args: string): string}
          | {one: string, someFunc(args: number): string}





          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks For all the help bcherny appreciate it.

            – Amol Gupta
            Nov 19 '18 at 6:09
















          2














          You want:



          type Foo =
          | {one: string, two: number, someFunc(args: string): string}
          | {one: string, someFunc(args: number): string}





          share|improve this answer
























          • Thanks For all the help bcherny appreciate it.

            – Amol Gupta
            Nov 19 '18 at 6:09














          2












          2








          2







          You want:



          type Foo =
          | {one: string, two: number, someFunc(args: string): string}
          | {one: string, someFunc(args: number): string}





          share|improve this answer













          You want:



          type Foo =
          | {one: string, two: number, someFunc(args: string): string}
          | {one: string, someFunc(args: number): string}






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 19 '18 at 5:21









          bchernybcherny

          2,0491524




          2,0491524













          • Thanks For all the help bcherny appreciate it.

            – Amol Gupta
            Nov 19 '18 at 6:09



















          • Thanks For all the help bcherny appreciate it.

            – Amol Gupta
            Nov 19 '18 at 6:09

















          Thanks For all the help bcherny appreciate it.

          – Amol Gupta
          Nov 19 '18 at 6:09





          Thanks For all the help bcherny appreciate it.

          – Amol Gupta
          Nov 19 '18 at 6:09


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53368260%2fmapped-type-for-optional-arguments%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          鏡平學校

          ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

          Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?