Best Way to set min/max values in Django Model field












0















I'm trying to get a field called WipID in my model to have the following:
- Primary Key
- and to have numbers between 000000001 and 999999999



Basically I want the field to always have 9 numbers. I don't care about auto-increment or not.



I've tried a number variations, but right now I have this:



WipID = models.BigAutoField(primary_key=True, validators=[MinValueValidator(000000001), MaxValueValidator(999999999)])


I've tried BigIntegerField and PositiveIntegerfield and those haven't worked either.



What's the best way to accomplish this? Any help is greatly appreciated on this.










share|improve this question























  • 000000001 isn't a number, it's a string. The number is just 1.

    – dirkgroten
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:35






  • 1





    What's the point in saving "00000001" to the database? Just use 1 - 999999999 using what you have now (MinValueValidator(1) is correct way of doing it) and if you want to display it differently, write a custom @property on your model to display the field as string with prepending the 0s.

    – dirkgroten
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:37













  • The information that we are using this for requires 9 digits ID's. So if I have something with an ID number of 1 in the database, but I display it as 000000001, nobody is going to know to search for just "1". Is my thinking right on this or no?

    – Dan
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:49
















0















I'm trying to get a field called WipID in my model to have the following:
- Primary Key
- and to have numbers between 000000001 and 999999999



Basically I want the field to always have 9 numbers. I don't care about auto-increment or not.



I've tried a number variations, but right now I have this:



WipID = models.BigAutoField(primary_key=True, validators=[MinValueValidator(000000001), MaxValueValidator(999999999)])


I've tried BigIntegerField and PositiveIntegerfield and those haven't worked either.



What's the best way to accomplish this? Any help is greatly appreciated on this.










share|improve this question























  • 000000001 isn't a number, it's a string. The number is just 1.

    – dirkgroten
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:35






  • 1





    What's the point in saving "00000001" to the database? Just use 1 - 999999999 using what you have now (MinValueValidator(1) is correct way of doing it) and if you want to display it differently, write a custom @property on your model to display the field as string with prepending the 0s.

    – dirkgroten
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:37













  • The information that we are using this for requires 9 digits ID's. So if I have something with an ID number of 1 in the database, but I display it as 000000001, nobody is going to know to search for just "1". Is my thinking right on this or no?

    – Dan
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:49














0












0








0








I'm trying to get a field called WipID in my model to have the following:
- Primary Key
- and to have numbers between 000000001 and 999999999



Basically I want the field to always have 9 numbers. I don't care about auto-increment or not.



I've tried a number variations, but right now I have this:



WipID = models.BigAutoField(primary_key=True, validators=[MinValueValidator(000000001), MaxValueValidator(999999999)])


I've tried BigIntegerField and PositiveIntegerfield and those haven't worked either.



What's the best way to accomplish this? Any help is greatly appreciated on this.










share|improve this question














I'm trying to get a field called WipID in my model to have the following:
- Primary Key
- and to have numbers between 000000001 and 999999999



Basically I want the field to always have 9 numbers. I don't care about auto-increment or not.



I've tried a number variations, but right now I have this:



WipID = models.BigAutoField(primary_key=True, validators=[MinValueValidator(000000001), MaxValueValidator(999999999)])


I've tried BigIntegerField and PositiveIntegerfield and those haven't worked either.



What's the best way to accomplish this? Any help is greatly appreciated on this.







python django django-models






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 20 '18 at 15:14









DanDan

616




616













  • 000000001 isn't a number, it's a string. The number is just 1.

    – dirkgroten
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:35






  • 1





    What's the point in saving "00000001" to the database? Just use 1 - 999999999 using what you have now (MinValueValidator(1) is correct way of doing it) and if you want to display it differently, write a custom @property on your model to display the field as string with prepending the 0s.

    – dirkgroten
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:37













  • The information that we are using this for requires 9 digits ID's. So if I have something with an ID number of 1 in the database, but I display it as 000000001, nobody is going to know to search for just "1". Is my thinking right on this or no?

    – Dan
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:49



















  • 000000001 isn't a number, it's a string. The number is just 1.

    – dirkgroten
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:35






  • 1





    What's the point in saving "00000001" to the database? Just use 1 - 999999999 using what you have now (MinValueValidator(1) is correct way of doing it) and if you want to display it differently, write a custom @property on your model to display the field as string with prepending the 0s.

    – dirkgroten
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:37













  • The information that we are using this for requires 9 digits ID's. So if I have something with an ID number of 1 in the database, but I display it as 000000001, nobody is going to know to search for just "1". Is my thinking right on this or no?

    – Dan
    Nov 20 '18 at 16:49

















000000001 isn't a number, it's a string. The number is just 1.

– dirkgroten
Nov 20 '18 at 16:35





000000001 isn't a number, it's a string. The number is just 1.

– dirkgroten
Nov 20 '18 at 16:35




1




1





What's the point in saving "00000001" to the database? Just use 1 - 999999999 using what you have now (MinValueValidator(1) is correct way of doing it) and if you want to display it differently, write a custom @property on your model to display the field as string with prepending the 0s.

– dirkgroten
Nov 20 '18 at 16:37







What's the point in saving "00000001" to the database? Just use 1 - 999999999 using what you have now (MinValueValidator(1) is correct way of doing it) and if you want to display it differently, write a custom @property on your model to display the field as string with prepending the 0s.

– dirkgroten
Nov 20 '18 at 16:37















The information that we are using this for requires 9 digits ID's. So if I have something with an ID number of 1 in the database, but I display it as 000000001, nobody is going to know to search for just "1". Is my thinking right on this or no?

– Dan
Nov 20 '18 at 16:49





The information that we are using this for requires 9 digits ID's. So if I have something with an ID number of 1 in the database, but I display it as 000000001, nobody is going to know to search for just "1". Is my thinking right on this or no?

– Dan
Nov 20 '18 at 16:49












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53396053%2fbest-way-to-set-min-max-values-in-django-model-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53396053%2fbest-way-to-set-min-max-values-in-django-model-field%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?