List a class's generic superclasses?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have an inheritance hierarchy:



public interface IValidator<TItem>

public abstract class Validator<TItem, TId> : IValidator<IItem>

public class MyValidator : Validator<MyItem, int>


I want to find every interface and superclass of MyValidator. I can do the interfaces easily with



return validator.GetType().GetInterfaces();


But when I try the same for superclasses, all I get back is System.Object, not Validator<MyItem, int>.



var type = validator.GetType();
return AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()
.SelectMany(a => a.GetTypes())
.Where(supertype => type.IsSubclassOf(supertype));


How can I get the full inheritance hierarchy?










share|improve this question


















  • 2




    a.GetTypes() does not get constructed types. But why are you not using typeof(MyValidator).BaseType?
    – PetSerAl
    Nov 12 at 3:58















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have an inheritance hierarchy:



public interface IValidator<TItem>

public abstract class Validator<TItem, TId> : IValidator<IItem>

public class MyValidator : Validator<MyItem, int>


I want to find every interface and superclass of MyValidator. I can do the interfaces easily with



return validator.GetType().GetInterfaces();


But when I try the same for superclasses, all I get back is System.Object, not Validator<MyItem, int>.



var type = validator.GetType();
return AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()
.SelectMany(a => a.GetTypes())
.Where(supertype => type.IsSubclassOf(supertype));


How can I get the full inheritance hierarchy?










share|improve this question


















  • 2




    a.GetTypes() does not get constructed types. But why are you not using typeof(MyValidator).BaseType?
    – PetSerAl
    Nov 12 at 3:58













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I have an inheritance hierarchy:



public interface IValidator<TItem>

public abstract class Validator<TItem, TId> : IValidator<IItem>

public class MyValidator : Validator<MyItem, int>


I want to find every interface and superclass of MyValidator. I can do the interfaces easily with



return validator.GetType().GetInterfaces();


But when I try the same for superclasses, all I get back is System.Object, not Validator<MyItem, int>.



var type = validator.GetType();
return AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()
.SelectMany(a => a.GetTypes())
.Where(supertype => type.IsSubclassOf(supertype));


How can I get the full inheritance hierarchy?










share|improve this question













I have an inheritance hierarchy:



public interface IValidator<TItem>

public abstract class Validator<TItem, TId> : IValidator<IItem>

public class MyValidator : Validator<MyItem, int>


I want to find every interface and superclass of MyValidator. I can do the interfaces easily with



return validator.GetType().GetInterfaces();


But when I try the same for superclasses, all I get back is System.Object, not Validator<MyItem, int>.



var type = validator.GetType();
return AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()
.SelectMany(a => a.GetTypes())
.Where(supertype => type.IsSubclassOf(supertype));


How can I get the full inheritance hierarchy?







c# generics inheritance reflection






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 12 at 3:38









Hand-E-Food

8,70263270




8,70263270








  • 2




    a.GetTypes() does not get constructed types. But why are you not using typeof(MyValidator).BaseType?
    – PetSerAl
    Nov 12 at 3:58














  • 2




    a.GetTypes() does not get constructed types. But why are you not using typeof(MyValidator).BaseType?
    – PetSerAl
    Nov 12 at 3:58








2




2




a.GetTypes() does not get constructed types. But why are you not using typeof(MyValidator).BaseType?
– PetSerAl
Nov 12 at 3:58




a.GetTypes() does not get constructed types. But why are you not using typeof(MyValidator).BaseType?
– PetSerAl
Nov 12 at 3:58












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Instead of iterating over each and every type in your assembly you can check base types. Also, you don't need an instance of MyValidator to get MyValidator type. Check this code:



var baseType = typeof(MyValidator).BaseType;
var baseTypes = new List<Type> { baseType };

while(baseType != typeof(object))
baseTypes.Add(baseType = baseType.BaseType);


Now baseTypes list contains Validator<MyItem, int> and object types.






share|improve this answer























  • what for while loop ? MyValidator can have only one base class
    – Z.R.T.
    Nov 12 at 4:05






  • 2




    @Z.R.T. sure, but base class of MyValidator may have base class too
    – vasily.sib
    Nov 12 at 4:07












  • Thank you! I knew it had to be that easy and I somehow missed that one every time.
    – Hand-E-Food
    Nov 12 at 4:10











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53255656%2flist-a-classs-generic-superclasses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Instead of iterating over each and every type in your assembly you can check base types. Also, you don't need an instance of MyValidator to get MyValidator type. Check this code:



var baseType = typeof(MyValidator).BaseType;
var baseTypes = new List<Type> { baseType };

while(baseType != typeof(object))
baseTypes.Add(baseType = baseType.BaseType);


Now baseTypes list contains Validator<MyItem, int> and object types.






share|improve this answer























  • what for while loop ? MyValidator can have only one base class
    – Z.R.T.
    Nov 12 at 4:05






  • 2




    @Z.R.T. sure, but base class of MyValidator may have base class too
    – vasily.sib
    Nov 12 at 4:07












  • Thank you! I knew it had to be that easy and I somehow missed that one every time.
    – Hand-E-Food
    Nov 12 at 4:10















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Instead of iterating over each and every type in your assembly you can check base types. Also, you don't need an instance of MyValidator to get MyValidator type. Check this code:



var baseType = typeof(MyValidator).BaseType;
var baseTypes = new List<Type> { baseType };

while(baseType != typeof(object))
baseTypes.Add(baseType = baseType.BaseType);


Now baseTypes list contains Validator<MyItem, int> and object types.






share|improve this answer























  • what for while loop ? MyValidator can have only one base class
    – Z.R.T.
    Nov 12 at 4:05






  • 2




    @Z.R.T. sure, but base class of MyValidator may have base class too
    – vasily.sib
    Nov 12 at 4:07












  • Thank you! I knew it had to be that easy and I somehow missed that one every time.
    – Hand-E-Food
    Nov 12 at 4:10













up vote
1
down vote



accepted







up vote
1
down vote



accepted






Instead of iterating over each and every type in your assembly you can check base types. Also, you don't need an instance of MyValidator to get MyValidator type. Check this code:



var baseType = typeof(MyValidator).BaseType;
var baseTypes = new List<Type> { baseType };

while(baseType != typeof(object))
baseTypes.Add(baseType = baseType.BaseType);


Now baseTypes list contains Validator<MyItem, int> and object types.






share|improve this answer














Instead of iterating over each and every type in your assembly you can check base types. Also, you don't need an instance of MyValidator to get MyValidator type. Check this code:



var baseType = typeof(MyValidator).BaseType;
var baseTypes = new List<Type> { baseType };

while(baseType != typeof(object))
baseTypes.Add(baseType = baseType.BaseType);


Now baseTypes list contains Validator<MyItem, int> and object types.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 12 at 4:08

























answered Nov 12 at 3:59









vasily.sib

1,9271919




1,9271919












  • what for while loop ? MyValidator can have only one base class
    – Z.R.T.
    Nov 12 at 4:05






  • 2




    @Z.R.T. sure, but base class of MyValidator may have base class too
    – vasily.sib
    Nov 12 at 4:07












  • Thank you! I knew it had to be that easy and I somehow missed that one every time.
    – Hand-E-Food
    Nov 12 at 4:10


















  • what for while loop ? MyValidator can have only one base class
    – Z.R.T.
    Nov 12 at 4:05






  • 2




    @Z.R.T. sure, but base class of MyValidator may have base class too
    – vasily.sib
    Nov 12 at 4:07












  • Thank you! I knew it had to be that easy and I somehow missed that one every time.
    – Hand-E-Food
    Nov 12 at 4:10
















what for while loop ? MyValidator can have only one base class
– Z.R.T.
Nov 12 at 4:05




what for while loop ? MyValidator can have only one base class
– Z.R.T.
Nov 12 at 4:05




2




2




@Z.R.T. sure, but base class of MyValidator may have base class too
– vasily.sib
Nov 12 at 4:07






@Z.R.T. sure, but base class of MyValidator may have base class too
– vasily.sib
Nov 12 at 4:07














Thank you! I knew it had to be that easy and I somehow missed that one every time.
– Hand-E-Food
Nov 12 at 4:10




Thank you! I knew it had to be that easy and I somehow missed that one every time.
– Hand-E-Food
Nov 12 at 4:10


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53255656%2flist-a-classs-generic-superclasses%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?