How to design a Calendar












0















It is an OOD question. Design a calendar.
The requirement are:




  • add event

  • delete an event

  • get all events for a particular day


Justify the data structure and design test cases



I know that I need to provide the APIs like addEvent(), deleteEvent(), getEventByDay()



I stuck at the first API, add an event.
I have proposed two solutions, I just do not know which pattern is better and why.



version1:



public class Calender {
// helper class
public static class Event {
String name;

Event(String s) {
name = s;
}
}

Calender() {

}

// API
public void addEvent(Event e) {
// todo
}

// driver function
public static void main(String args) {
Calender calender = new Calender();

Event event = new Event("event");
calender.addEvent(event);
}
}


version2:



public class Calender {
int systemId;

// helper class
public static class Event {
String name;

Event(String s) {
name = s;
}
}

Calender() {

}

// API
public int addEvent(String s) {
Event event = new Event(s);
systemId++;
return systemId - 1; // after add an event, return the unique id for it
}

// driver function
public static void main(String args) {
Calender calender = new Calender();
int id = calender.addEvent("a");
}
}


The above class is not completed.
The major difference is that do we need to let the user create an Event then add this instance or just using existing API to create a event and get a unique id for this event?










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it seems like it would be a better fit for codereview.stackexchange.com

    – DaveyDaveDave
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:44
















0















It is an OOD question. Design a calendar.
The requirement are:




  • add event

  • delete an event

  • get all events for a particular day


Justify the data structure and design test cases



I know that I need to provide the APIs like addEvent(), deleteEvent(), getEventByDay()



I stuck at the first API, add an event.
I have proposed two solutions, I just do not know which pattern is better and why.



version1:



public class Calender {
// helper class
public static class Event {
String name;

Event(String s) {
name = s;
}
}

Calender() {

}

// API
public void addEvent(Event e) {
// todo
}

// driver function
public static void main(String args) {
Calender calender = new Calender();

Event event = new Event("event");
calender.addEvent(event);
}
}


version2:



public class Calender {
int systemId;

// helper class
public static class Event {
String name;

Event(String s) {
name = s;
}
}

Calender() {

}

// API
public int addEvent(String s) {
Event event = new Event(s);
systemId++;
return systemId - 1; // after add an event, return the unique id for it
}

// driver function
public static void main(String args) {
Calender calender = new Calender();
int id = calender.addEvent("a");
}
}


The above class is not completed.
The major difference is that do we need to let the user create an Event then add this instance or just using existing API to create a event and get a unique id for this event?










share|improve this question




















  • 3





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it seems like it would be a better fit for codereview.stackexchange.com

    – DaveyDaveDave
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:44














0












0








0








It is an OOD question. Design a calendar.
The requirement are:




  • add event

  • delete an event

  • get all events for a particular day


Justify the data structure and design test cases



I know that I need to provide the APIs like addEvent(), deleteEvent(), getEventByDay()



I stuck at the first API, add an event.
I have proposed two solutions, I just do not know which pattern is better and why.



version1:



public class Calender {
// helper class
public static class Event {
String name;

Event(String s) {
name = s;
}
}

Calender() {

}

// API
public void addEvent(Event e) {
// todo
}

// driver function
public static void main(String args) {
Calender calender = new Calender();

Event event = new Event("event");
calender.addEvent(event);
}
}


version2:



public class Calender {
int systemId;

// helper class
public static class Event {
String name;

Event(String s) {
name = s;
}
}

Calender() {

}

// API
public int addEvent(String s) {
Event event = new Event(s);
systemId++;
return systemId - 1; // after add an event, return the unique id for it
}

// driver function
public static void main(String args) {
Calender calender = new Calender();
int id = calender.addEvent("a");
}
}


The above class is not completed.
The major difference is that do we need to let the user create an Event then add this instance or just using existing API to create a event and get a unique id for this event?










share|improve this question
















It is an OOD question. Design a calendar.
The requirement are:




  • add event

  • delete an event

  • get all events for a particular day


Justify the data structure and design test cases



I know that I need to provide the APIs like addEvent(), deleteEvent(), getEventByDay()



I stuck at the first API, add an event.
I have proposed two solutions, I just do not know which pattern is better and why.



version1:



public class Calender {
// helper class
public static class Event {
String name;

Event(String s) {
name = s;
}
}

Calender() {

}

// API
public void addEvent(Event e) {
// todo
}

// driver function
public static void main(String args) {
Calender calender = new Calender();

Event event = new Event("event");
calender.addEvent(event);
}
}


version2:



public class Calender {
int systemId;

// helper class
public static class Event {
String name;

Event(String s) {
name = s;
}
}

Calender() {

}

// API
public int addEvent(String s) {
Event event = new Event(s);
systemId++;
return systemId - 1; // after add an event, return the unique id for it
}

// driver function
public static void main(String args) {
Calender calender = new Calender();
int id = calender.addEvent("a");
}
}


The above class is not completed.
The major difference is that do we need to let the user create an Event then add this instance or just using existing API to create a event and get a unique id for this event?







java algorithm oop system






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 20 '18 at 11:23









Joris Schellekens

6,16011242




6,16011242










asked Nov 20 '18 at 9:30









TianboTianbo

276




276








  • 3





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it seems like it would be a better fit for codereview.stackexchange.com

    – DaveyDaveDave
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:44














  • 3





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it seems like it would be a better fit for codereview.stackexchange.com

    – DaveyDaveDave
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:44








3




3





I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it seems like it would be a better fit for codereview.stackexchange.com

– DaveyDaveDave
Nov 20 '18 at 9:44





I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it seems like it would be a better fit for codereview.stackexchange.com

– DaveyDaveDave
Nov 20 '18 at 9:44












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














I would keep both methods. Allow the user to either insert a new Event object or just pass the string and add it.



public class Calendar {
public static class Event {
String name;

Event(String s) {
name = s;
}
}

Calendar() {
}

public void addEvent(Event e) {
// todo
}

public int addEvent(String s) {
Event event = new Event(s);
systemId++;
return systemId - 1; // after add an event, return the unique id for it
}

}


That said, I would do the following:




  • Remove the main from the Calendar class, it should be in a separate Application class for example, that would instantiate your calendar.

  • Instead of returning the ID of the event when you add it, add a field id to your Event class, fill it with the new ID, and return the whole Event object.

  • Maybe put the Event class in a separate file instead of having it in Calendar. It's arguable if it makes sense or not so that's left to your appreciation.


Beside that, you should store the list of events in your calendar, in order to be able to return the whole list of events or to delete one, as stated by the subject of your exercise.






share|improve this answer































    1














    Calendar and Event, as I identify, are two different, self contained entities.
    Although an Event may be dependent on the Calendar object to store its date/time specific. They should be independent, and may not be wrapped within a Calendar API.



    That being said, the version2 looks more promising, and scalable. Version2 gives you flexibility to modify the Event class to extend the capabilities, modify constructors, or add methods easily, without affecting Calendar .



    For example, if you need to add the Event's venue along with its Name, you can simply modify Event's constructor. Or add another method inside the Event class. Leaving Calendar unaffected.



    On a different design point, the Event class can also extend Calendar, if the Calendar use case is only specific to adding date/time capabilities to an Event.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53389946%2fhow-to-design-a-calendar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      I would keep both methods. Allow the user to either insert a new Event object or just pass the string and add it.



      public class Calendar {
      public static class Event {
      String name;

      Event(String s) {
      name = s;
      }
      }

      Calendar() {
      }

      public void addEvent(Event e) {
      // todo
      }

      public int addEvent(String s) {
      Event event = new Event(s);
      systemId++;
      return systemId - 1; // after add an event, return the unique id for it
      }

      }


      That said, I would do the following:




      • Remove the main from the Calendar class, it should be in a separate Application class for example, that would instantiate your calendar.

      • Instead of returning the ID of the event when you add it, add a field id to your Event class, fill it with the new ID, and return the whole Event object.

      • Maybe put the Event class in a separate file instead of having it in Calendar. It's arguable if it makes sense or not so that's left to your appreciation.


      Beside that, you should store the list of events in your calendar, in order to be able to return the whole list of events or to delete one, as stated by the subject of your exercise.






      share|improve this answer




























        1














        I would keep both methods. Allow the user to either insert a new Event object or just pass the string and add it.



        public class Calendar {
        public static class Event {
        String name;

        Event(String s) {
        name = s;
        }
        }

        Calendar() {
        }

        public void addEvent(Event e) {
        // todo
        }

        public int addEvent(String s) {
        Event event = new Event(s);
        systemId++;
        return systemId - 1; // after add an event, return the unique id for it
        }

        }


        That said, I would do the following:




        • Remove the main from the Calendar class, it should be in a separate Application class for example, that would instantiate your calendar.

        • Instead of returning the ID of the event when you add it, add a field id to your Event class, fill it with the new ID, and return the whole Event object.

        • Maybe put the Event class in a separate file instead of having it in Calendar. It's arguable if it makes sense or not so that's left to your appreciation.


        Beside that, you should store the list of events in your calendar, in order to be able to return the whole list of events or to delete one, as stated by the subject of your exercise.






        share|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1







          I would keep both methods. Allow the user to either insert a new Event object or just pass the string and add it.



          public class Calendar {
          public static class Event {
          String name;

          Event(String s) {
          name = s;
          }
          }

          Calendar() {
          }

          public void addEvent(Event e) {
          // todo
          }

          public int addEvent(String s) {
          Event event = new Event(s);
          systemId++;
          return systemId - 1; // after add an event, return the unique id for it
          }

          }


          That said, I would do the following:




          • Remove the main from the Calendar class, it should be in a separate Application class for example, that would instantiate your calendar.

          • Instead of returning the ID of the event when you add it, add a field id to your Event class, fill it with the new ID, and return the whole Event object.

          • Maybe put the Event class in a separate file instead of having it in Calendar. It's arguable if it makes sense or not so that's left to your appreciation.


          Beside that, you should store the list of events in your calendar, in order to be able to return the whole list of events or to delete one, as stated by the subject of your exercise.






          share|improve this answer













          I would keep both methods. Allow the user to either insert a new Event object or just pass the string and add it.



          public class Calendar {
          public static class Event {
          String name;

          Event(String s) {
          name = s;
          }
          }

          Calendar() {
          }

          public void addEvent(Event e) {
          // todo
          }

          public int addEvent(String s) {
          Event event = new Event(s);
          systemId++;
          return systemId - 1; // after add an event, return the unique id for it
          }

          }


          That said, I would do the following:




          • Remove the main from the Calendar class, it should be in a separate Application class for example, that would instantiate your calendar.

          • Instead of returning the ID of the event when you add it, add a field id to your Event class, fill it with the new ID, and return the whole Event object.

          • Maybe put the Event class in a separate file instead of having it in Calendar. It's arguable if it makes sense or not so that's left to your appreciation.


          Beside that, you should store the list of events in your calendar, in order to be able to return the whole list of events or to delete one, as stated by the subject of your exercise.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 20 '18 at 9:36









          AntoineBAntoineB

          2,30811742




          2,30811742

























              1














              Calendar and Event, as I identify, are two different, self contained entities.
              Although an Event may be dependent on the Calendar object to store its date/time specific. They should be independent, and may not be wrapped within a Calendar API.



              That being said, the version2 looks more promising, and scalable. Version2 gives you flexibility to modify the Event class to extend the capabilities, modify constructors, or add methods easily, without affecting Calendar .



              For example, if you need to add the Event's venue along with its Name, you can simply modify Event's constructor. Or add another method inside the Event class. Leaving Calendar unaffected.



              On a different design point, the Event class can also extend Calendar, if the Calendar use case is only specific to adding date/time capabilities to an Event.






              share|improve this answer




























                1














                Calendar and Event, as I identify, are two different, self contained entities.
                Although an Event may be dependent on the Calendar object to store its date/time specific. They should be independent, and may not be wrapped within a Calendar API.



                That being said, the version2 looks more promising, and scalable. Version2 gives you flexibility to modify the Event class to extend the capabilities, modify constructors, or add methods easily, without affecting Calendar .



                For example, if you need to add the Event's venue along with its Name, you can simply modify Event's constructor. Or add another method inside the Event class. Leaving Calendar unaffected.



                On a different design point, the Event class can also extend Calendar, if the Calendar use case is only specific to adding date/time capabilities to an Event.






                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  Calendar and Event, as I identify, are two different, self contained entities.
                  Although an Event may be dependent on the Calendar object to store its date/time specific. They should be independent, and may not be wrapped within a Calendar API.



                  That being said, the version2 looks more promising, and scalable. Version2 gives you flexibility to modify the Event class to extend the capabilities, modify constructors, or add methods easily, without affecting Calendar .



                  For example, if you need to add the Event's venue along with its Name, you can simply modify Event's constructor. Or add another method inside the Event class. Leaving Calendar unaffected.



                  On a different design point, the Event class can also extend Calendar, if the Calendar use case is only specific to adding date/time capabilities to an Event.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Calendar and Event, as I identify, are two different, self contained entities.
                  Although an Event may be dependent on the Calendar object to store its date/time specific. They should be independent, and may not be wrapped within a Calendar API.



                  That being said, the version2 looks more promising, and scalable. Version2 gives you flexibility to modify the Event class to extend the capabilities, modify constructors, or add methods easily, without affecting Calendar .



                  For example, if you need to add the Event's venue along with its Name, you can simply modify Event's constructor. Or add another method inside the Event class. Leaving Calendar unaffected.



                  On a different design point, the Event class can also extend Calendar, if the Calendar use case is only specific to adding date/time capabilities to an Event.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 20 '18 at 9:46









                  ShariqShariq

                  374112




                  374112






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53389946%2fhow-to-design-a-calendar%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      鏡平學校

                      ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

                      Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?