How to test a className with Jest and React testing library












1















I am totally new to JavaScript testing and working in a new codebase. I would like to write a test that is checking for a className on the element. I am working with Jest and react-testing-library. Below I have a test that will render a button based on the variant prop. It also contains a className and .I would like to test that.



it('Renders with a className equal to the variant', () => {
const { container } = render(<Button variant="default" />)
expect(container.firstChild) // Check for className here
})


I tried to google for a property like Enzyme has with hasClass but couldn't find anything. Does anyone know how to solve this with current libraries (react-testing-library, Jest)?










share|improve this question

























  • You should use Enzyme, it's meant to work with jest for this very reason. Jest is great for testing functionality, Enzyme for component testing and rendering.

    – AnonymousSB
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:56
















1















I am totally new to JavaScript testing and working in a new codebase. I would like to write a test that is checking for a className on the element. I am working with Jest and react-testing-library. Below I have a test that will render a button based on the variant prop. It also contains a className and .I would like to test that.



it('Renders with a className equal to the variant', () => {
const { container } = render(<Button variant="default" />)
expect(container.firstChild) // Check for className here
})


I tried to google for a property like Enzyme has with hasClass but couldn't find anything. Does anyone know how to solve this with current libraries (react-testing-library, Jest)?










share|improve this question

























  • You should use Enzyme, it's meant to work with jest for this very reason. Jest is great for testing functionality, Enzyme for component testing and rendering.

    – AnonymousSB
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:56














1












1








1








I am totally new to JavaScript testing and working in a new codebase. I would like to write a test that is checking for a className on the element. I am working with Jest and react-testing-library. Below I have a test that will render a button based on the variant prop. It also contains a className and .I would like to test that.



it('Renders with a className equal to the variant', () => {
const { container } = render(<Button variant="default" />)
expect(container.firstChild) // Check for className here
})


I tried to google for a property like Enzyme has with hasClass but couldn't find anything. Does anyone know how to solve this with current libraries (react-testing-library, Jest)?










share|improve this question
















I am totally new to JavaScript testing and working in a new codebase. I would like to write a test that is checking for a className on the element. I am working with Jest and react-testing-library. Below I have a test that will render a button based on the variant prop. It also contains a className and .I would like to test that.



it('Renders with a className equal to the variant', () => {
const { container } = render(<Button variant="default" />)
expect(container.firstChild) // Check for className here
})


I tried to google for a property like Enzyme has with hasClass but couldn't find anything. Does anyone know how to solve this with current libraries (react-testing-library, Jest)?







javascript reactjs jestjs react-testing-library






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 20 '18 at 17:20









skyboyer

3,83311229




3,83311229










asked Nov 20 '18 at 9:31









GijsbertsGijsberts

1,82321846




1,82321846













  • You should use Enzyme, it's meant to work with jest for this very reason. Jest is great for testing functionality, Enzyme for component testing and rendering.

    – AnonymousSB
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:56



















  • You should use Enzyme, it's meant to work with jest for this very reason. Jest is great for testing functionality, Enzyme for component testing and rendering.

    – AnonymousSB
    Nov 20 '18 at 9:56

















You should use Enzyme, it's meant to work with jest for this very reason. Jest is great for testing functionality, Enzyme for component testing and rendering.

– AnonymousSB
Nov 20 '18 at 9:56





You should use Enzyme, it's meant to work with jest for this very reason. Jest is great for testing functionality, Enzyme for component testing and rendering.

– AnonymousSB
Nov 20 '18 at 9:56












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














You can easily do that with react-testing-library.



First, you have to understand that container or the result of getByText etc. are merely DOM nodes. You can interact with them in the same way you would do in a browser.



So, if you want to know what class is applied to container.firstChild you can just do it like this container.firstChild.className.



If you read more about className in MDN you'll see that it returns all the classes applied to your element separated by a space, that is:



<div class="foo">     => className === 'foo'
<div class="foo bar"> => className === 'foo bar'


This might not be the best solution depending on your case. No worries, you can use another browser API, for example classList.



expect(container.firstChild.classList.contains('foo')).toBe(true)


That's it! No need to learn a new API that works only for tests. It's just as in the browser.



If checking for a class is something you do often you can make the tests easier by adding jest-dom to your project.



The test then becomes:



expect(container.firstChild).toHaveClass('foo')


There are a bunch of other handy methods like toHaveStyle that could help you.





As a side note, react-testing-library is a proper JavaScript testing utility. It has many advantages over other libraries. I encourage you to join the spectrum forum if you're new to JavaScript testing.






share|improve this answer


























  • Hey! I see that you are using toBeTrue but for some reason I get the TypeError: expect(...).toBeTrue is not a function. I run the latest Jest version. The toHaveClass is working fine!

    – Gijsberts
    Nov 20 '18 at 11:22











  • My bad it's toBe(true) I fixed it. I use toHaveClass though, way easier

    – Gpx
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:47






  • 1





    This should be accepted as the answer.

    – Igor Ilić
    Feb 6 at 7:57



















-2














As mentioned by other people, you would need to use enzyme.
Do set up enzyme for your application before trying out the code structure below.



A simple example to how to use hasclass



import React from 'react'


import CreateCode from 'modules/ReferralPage/components/CreateCode.js'



import { shallow } from 'enzyme';



describe('<CreateCode /> component tests', () => {



it('Shallow renders CreateCode component', () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<CreateCode />).dive();
expect(wrapper.hasClass('container')).toEqual(true);
});


});



Apologies for the formatting






share|improve this answer































    -3














    At first you should use a proper JavaScript Testing utility, such as:





    • Enzyme;


    • Chai (Chai-Enzume);

    • so on...


    Those libraries will provide you several methods to assert your application, so you could simply assert your current case like this:



    With Enzyme:



    const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent />);
    expect(wrapper.find('.my-button').hasClass('disabled')).to.equal(true);


    Documentation: Enzyme hasClass





    With Chai-Enzyme:



    const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent />);

    expect(wrapper.find('span')).to.have.className('child');
    expect(wrapper.find('span')).to.not.have.className('root');


    Documentation: chai-enzyme className






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53389956%2fhow-to-test-a-classname-with-jest-and-react-testing-library%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4














      You can easily do that with react-testing-library.



      First, you have to understand that container or the result of getByText etc. are merely DOM nodes. You can interact with them in the same way you would do in a browser.



      So, if you want to know what class is applied to container.firstChild you can just do it like this container.firstChild.className.



      If you read more about className in MDN you'll see that it returns all the classes applied to your element separated by a space, that is:



      <div class="foo">     => className === 'foo'
      <div class="foo bar"> => className === 'foo bar'


      This might not be the best solution depending on your case. No worries, you can use another browser API, for example classList.



      expect(container.firstChild.classList.contains('foo')).toBe(true)


      That's it! No need to learn a new API that works only for tests. It's just as in the browser.



      If checking for a class is something you do often you can make the tests easier by adding jest-dom to your project.



      The test then becomes:



      expect(container.firstChild).toHaveClass('foo')


      There are a bunch of other handy methods like toHaveStyle that could help you.





      As a side note, react-testing-library is a proper JavaScript testing utility. It has many advantages over other libraries. I encourage you to join the spectrum forum if you're new to JavaScript testing.






      share|improve this answer


























      • Hey! I see that you are using toBeTrue but for some reason I get the TypeError: expect(...).toBeTrue is not a function. I run the latest Jest version. The toHaveClass is working fine!

        – Gijsberts
        Nov 20 '18 at 11:22











      • My bad it's toBe(true) I fixed it. I use toHaveClass though, way easier

        – Gpx
        Nov 20 '18 at 14:47






      • 1





        This should be accepted as the answer.

        – Igor Ilić
        Feb 6 at 7:57
















      4














      You can easily do that with react-testing-library.



      First, you have to understand that container or the result of getByText etc. are merely DOM nodes. You can interact with them in the same way you would do in a browser.



      So, if you want to know what class is applied to container.firstChild you can just do it like this container.firstChild.className.



      If you read more about className in MDN you'll see that it returns all the classes applied to your element separated by a space, that is:



      <div class="foo">     => className === 'foo'
      <div class="foo bar"> => className === 'foo bar'


      This might not be the best solution depending on your case. No worries, you can use another browser API, for example classList.



      expect(container.firstChild.classList.contains('foo')).toBe(true)


      That's it! No need to learn a new API that works only for tests. It's just as in the browser.



      If checking for a class is something you do often you can make the tests easier by adding jest-dom to your project.



      The test then becomes:



      expect(container.firstChild).toHaveClass('foo')


      There are a bunch of other handy methods like toHaveStyle that could help you.





      As a side note, react-testing-library is a proper JavaScript testing utility. It has many advantages over other libraries. I encourage you to join the spectrum forum if you're new to JavaScript testing.






      share|improve this answer


























      • Hey! I see that you are using toBeTrue but for some reason I get the TypeError: expect(...).toBeTrue is not a function. I run the latest Jest version. The toHaveClass is working fine!

        – Gijsberts
        Nov 20 '18 at 11:22











      • My bad it's toBe(true) I fixed it. I use toHaveClass though, way easier

        – Gpx
        Nov 20 '18 at 14:47






      • 1





        This should be accepted as the answer.

        – Igor Ilić
        Feb 6 at 7:57














      4












      4








      4







      You can easily do that with react-testing-library.



      First, you have to understand that container or the result of getByText etc. are merely DOM nodes. You can interact with them in the same way you would do in a browser.



      So, if you want to know what class is applied to container.firstChild you can just do it like this container.firstChild.className.



      If you read more about className in MDN you'll see that it returns all the classes applied to your element separated by a space, that is:



      <div class="foo">     => className === 'foo'
      <div class="foo bar"> => className === 'foo bar'


      This might not be the best solution depending on your case. No worries, you can use another browser API, for example classList.



      expect(container.firstChild.classList.contains('foo')).toBe(true)


      That's it! No need to learn a new API that works only for tests. It's just as in the browser.



      If checking for a class is something you do often you can make the tests easier by adding jest-dom to your project.



      The test then becomes:



      expect(container.firstChild).toHaveClass('foo')


      There are a bunch of other handy methods like toHaveStyle that could help you.





      As a side note, react-testing-library is a proper JavaScript testing utility. It has many advantages over other libraries. I encourage you to join the spectrum forum if you're new to JavaScript testing.






      share|improve this answer















      You can easily do that with react-testing-library.



      First, you have to understand that container or the result of getByText etc. are merely DOM nodes. You can interact with them in the same way you would do in a browser.



      So, if you want to know what class is applied to container.firstChild you can just do it like this container.firstChild.className.



      If you read more about className in MDN you'll see that it returns all the classes applied to your element separated by a space, that is:



      <div class="foo">     => className === 'foo'
      <div class="foo bar"> => className === 'foo bar'


      This might not be the best solution depending on your case. No worries, you can use another browser API, for example classList.



      expect(container.firstChild.classList.contains('foo')).toBe(true)


      That's it! No need to learn a new API that works only for tests. It's just as in the browser.



      If checking for a class is something you do often you can make the tests easier by adding jest-dom to your project.



      The test then becomes:



      expect(container.firstChild).toHaveClass('foo')


      There are a bunch of other handy methods like toHaveStyle that could help you.





      As a side note, react-testing-library is a proper JavaScript testing utility. It has many advantages over other libraries. I encourage you to join the spectrum forum if you're new to JavaScript testing.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Nov 20 '18 at 14:47

























      answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:56









      GpxGpx

      1,91021625




      1,91021625













      • Hey! I see that you are using toBeTrue but for some reason I get the TypeError: expect(...).toBeTrue is not a function. I run the latest Jest version. The toHaveClass is working fine!

        – Gijsberts
        Nov 20 '18 at 11:22











      • My bad it's toBe(true) I fixed it. I use toHaveClass though, way easier

        – Gpx
        Nov 20 '18 at 14:47






      • 1





        This should be accepted as the answer.

        – Igor Ilić
        Feb 6 at 7:57



















      • Hey! I see that you are using toBeTrue but for some reason I get the TypeError: expect(...).toBeTrue is not a function. I run the latest Jest version. The toHaveClass is working fine!

        – Gijsberts
        Nov 20 '18 at 11:22











      • My bad it's toBe(true) I fixed it. I use toHaveClass though, way easier

        – Gpx
        Nov 20 '18 at 14:47






      • 1





        This should be accepted as the answer.

        – Igor Ilić
        Feb 6 at 7:57

















      Hey! I see that you are using toBeTrue but for some reason I get the TypeError: expect(...).toBeTrue is not a function. I run the latest Jest version. The toHaveClass is working fine!

      – Gijsberts
      Nov 20 '18 at 11:22





      Hey! I see that you are using toBeTrue but for some reason I get the TypeError: expect(...).toBeTrue is not a function. I run the latest Jest version. The toHaveClass is working fine!

      – Gijsberts
      Nov 20 '18 at 11:22













      My bad it's toBe(true) I fixed it. I use toHaveClass though, way easier

      – Gpx
      Nov 20 '18 at 14:47





      My bad it's toBe(true) I fixed it. I use toHaveClass though, way easier

      – Gpx
      Nov 20 '18 at 14:47




      1




      1





      This should be accepted as the answer.

      – Igor Ilić
      Feb 6 at 7:57





      This should be accepted as the answer.

      – Igor Ilić
      Feb 6 at 7:57













      -2














      As mentioned by other people, you would need to use enzyme.
      Do set up enzyme for your application before trying out the code structure below.



      A simple example to how to use hasclass



      import React from 'react'


      import CreateCode from 'modules/ReferralPage/components/CreateCode.js'



      import { shallow } from 'enzyme';



      describe('<CreateCode /> component tests', () => {



      it('Shallow renders CreateCode component', () => {
      const wrapper = shallow(<CreateCode />).dive();
      expect(wrapper.hasClass('container')).toEqual(true);
      });


      });



      Apologies for the formatting






      share|improve this answer




























        -2














        As mentioned by other people, you would need to use enzyme.
        Do set up enzyme for your application before trying out the code structure below.



        A simple example to how to use hasclass



        import React from 'react'


        import CreateCode from 'modules/ReferralPage/components/CreateCode.js'



        import { shallow } from 'enzyme';



        describe('<CreateCode /> component tests', () => {



        it('Shallow renders CreateCode component', () => {
        const wrapper = shallow(<CreateCode />).dive();
        expect(wrapper.hasClass('container')).toEqual(true);
        });


        });



        Apologies for the formatting






        share|improve this answer


























          -2












          -2








          -2







          As mentioned by other people, you would need to use enzyme.
          Do set up enzyme for your application before trying out the code structure below.



          A simple example to how to use hasclass



          import React from 'react'


          import CreateCode from 'modules/ReferralPage/components/CreateCode.js'



          import { shallow } from 'enzyme';



          describe('<CreateCode /> component tests', () => {



          it('Shallow renders CreateCode component', () => {
          const wrapper = shallow(<CreateCode />).dive();
          expect(wrapper.hasClass('container')).toEqual(true);
          });


          });



          Apologies for the formatting






          share|improve this answer













          As mentioned by other people, you would need to use enzyme.
          Do set up enzyme for your application before trying out the code structure below.



          A simple example to how to use hasclass



          import React from 'react'


          import CreateCode from 'modules/ReferralPage/components/CreateCode.js'



          import { shallow } from 'enzyme';



          describe('<CreateCode /> component tests', () => {



          it('Shallow renders CreateCode component', () => {
          const wrapper = shallow(<CreateCode />).dive();
          expect(wrapper.hasClass('container')).toEqual(true);
          });


          });



          Apologies for the formatting







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 21 '18 at 9:39









          Manish PoduvalManish Poduval

          301112




          301112























              -3














              At first you should use a proper JavaScript Testing utility, such as:





              • Enzyme;


              • Chai (Chai-Enzume);

              • so on...


              Those libraries will provide you several methods to assert your application, so you could simply assert your current case like this:



              With Enzyme:



              const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent />);
              expect(wrapper.find('.my-button').hasClass('disabled')).to.equal(true);


              Documentation: Enzyme hasClass





              With Chai-Enzyme:



              const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent />);

              expect(wrapper.find('span')).to.have.className('child');
              expect(wrapper.find('span')).to.not.have.className('root');


              Documentation: chai-enzyme className






              share|improve this answer




























                -3














                At first you should use a proper JavaScript Testing utility, such as:





                • Enzyme;


                • Chai (Chai-Enzume);

                • so on...


                Those libraries will provide you several methods to assert your application, so you could simply assert your current case like this:



                With Enzyme:



                const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent />);
                expect(wrapper.find('.my-button').hasClass('disabled')).to.equal(true);


                Documentation: Enzyme hasClass





                With Chai-Enzyme:



                const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent />);

                expect(wrapper.find('span')).to.have.className('child');
                expect(wrapper.find('span')).to.not.have.className('root');


                Documentation: chai-enzyme className






                share|improve this answer


























                  -3












                  -3








                  -3







                  At first you should use a proper JavaScript Testing utility, such as:





                  • Enzyme;


                  • Chai (Chai-Enzume);

                  • so on...


                  Those libraries will provide you several methods to assert your application, so you could simply assert your current case like this:



                  With Enzyme:



                  const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent />);
                  expect(wrapper.find('.my-button').hasClass('disabled')).to.equal(true);


                  Documentation: Enzyme hasClass





                  With Chai-Enzyme:



                  const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent />);

                  expect(wrapper.find('span')).to.have.className('child');
                  expect(wrapper.find('span')).to.not.have.className('root');


                  Documentation: chai-enzyme className






                  share|improve this answer













                  At first you should use a proper JavaScript Testing utility, such as:





                  • Enzyme;


                  • Chai (Chai-Enzume);

                  • so on...


                  Those libraries will provide you several methods to assert your application, so you could simply assert your current case like this:



                  With Enzyme:



                  const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent />);
                  expect(wrapper.find('.my-button').hasClass('disabled')).to.equal(true);


                  Documentation: Enzyme hasClass





                  With Chai-Enzyme:



                  const wrapper = mount(<MyComponent />);

                  expect(wrapper.find('span')).to.have.className('child');
                  expect(wrapper.find('span')).to.not.have.className('root');


                  Documentation: chai-enzyme className







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 20 '18 at 10:03









                  Marcos GonçalvesMarcos Gonçalves

                  401




                  401






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53389956%2fhow-to-test-a-classname-with-jest-and-react-testing-library%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      鏡平學校

                      ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

                      Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?