R Merging Map ShapeFiles Together












2















I am attempting to merge two shapefiles together in R to plot.



I have downloaded the ShapeFile format of the political boundaries of the Carribbean from here and the ShapeFile of U.S. county borders from this link.



I have read in both files with



US_counties <- shapefile("~/us_county_shp_files/tl_2017_us_county.shp")
carribbean <- shapefile("~/pol6bg/pol6bg.shp")


From looking at other posts, I have tried using both the union and the rbind methods.



With rbind (shown below), I get the error: identicalCRS(dots) is not TRUE.



rbind(US_counties, carribbean, makeUniqueIDs = TRUE)


With union, I get Error in as.vector(x) : no method for coercing this S4 class to a vector.



union(US_counties, carribbean)


Thanks in advance!










share|improve this question





























    2















    I am attempting to merge two shapefiles together in R to plot.



    I have downloaded the ShapeFile format of the political boundaries of the Carribbean from here and the ShapeFile of U.S. county borders from this link.



    I have read in both files with



    US_counties <- shapefile("~/us_county_shp_files/tl_2017_us_county.shp")
    carribbean <- shapefile("~/pol6bg/pol6bg.shp")


    From looking at other posts, I have tried using both the union and the rbind methods.



    With rbind (shown below), I get the error: identicalCRS(dots) is not TRUE.



    rbind(US_counties, carribbean, makeUniqueIDs = TRUE)


    With union, I get Error in as.vector(x) : no method for coercing this S4 class to a vector.



    union(US_counties, carribbean)


    Thanks in advance!










    share|improve this question



























      2












      2








      2








      I am attempting to merge two shapefiles together in R to plot.



      I have downloaded the ShapeFile format of the political boundaries of the Carribbean from here and the ShapeFile of U.S. county borders from this link.



      I have read in both files with



      US_counties <- shapefile("~/us_county_shp_files/tl_2017_us_county.shp")
      carribbean <- shapefile("~/pol6bg/pol6bg.shp")


      From looking at other posts, I have tried using both the union and the rbind methods.



      With rbind (shown below), I get the error: identicalCRS(dots) is not TRUE.



      rbind(US_counties, carribbean, makeUniqueIDs = TRUE)


      With union, I get Error in as.vector(x) : no method for coercing this S4 class to a vector.



      union(US_counties, carribbean)


      Thanks in advance!










      share|improve this question
















      I am attempting to merge two shapefiles together in R to plot.



      I have downloaded the ShapeFile format of the political boundaries of the Carribbean from here and the ShapeFile of U.S. county borders from this link.



      I have read in both files with



      US_counties <- shapefile("~/us_county_shp_files/tl_2017_us_county.shp")
      carribbean <- shapefile("~/pol6bg/pol6bg.shp")


      From looking at other posts, I have tried using both the union and the rbind methods.



      With rbind (shown below), I get the error: identicalCRS(dots) is not TRUE.



      rbind(US_counties, carribbean, makeUniqueIDs = TRUE)


      With union, I get Error in as.vector(x) : no method for coercing this S4 class to a vector.



      union(US_counties, carribbean)


      Thanks in advance!







      r shapefile






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 19 '18 at 17:53







      Alan

















      asked Nov 19 '18 at 16:24









      AlanAlan

      9110




      9110
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Firstly, the error when using union seems to arise due to conflicting packages. In particular, not the right function union is being called. Using



          raster:::union(US_counties, carribbean)


          gives



          Warning message:
          In union(US_counties, carribbean) : non identical CRS


          which possibly is an important warning and says the same as when trying to use `rbind. Perhaps you know more about CRS (Coordinate Reference Systems) than me, but the problem is that



          proj4string(carribbean)
          # [1] "+proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0"
          proj4string(US_counties)
          # [1] "+proj=longlat +datum=NAD83 +no_defs +ellps=GRS80 +towgs84=0,0,0"


          So, not very surprisingly, the two shape files are of somewhat different formats. With the help of this useful read we see that it's not hard to unify those formats, after all. E.g.,



          library(sp)
          carribbean <- spTransform(carribbean, proj4string(US_counties))


          Then



          rbind(US_counties, carribbean, makeUniqueIDs = TRUE)
          # Error in rbind(deparse.level, ...) :
          # numbers of columns of arguments do not match


          still doesn't work, but the problem is clear given that we are trying to bind different variables



          names(US_counties)
          # [1] "STATEFP" "COUNTYFP" "COUNTYNS" "GEOID" "NAME" "NAMELSAD" "LSAD" "CLASSFP"
          # [9] "MTFCC" "CSAFP" "CBSAFP" "METDIVFP" "FUNCSTAT" "ALAND" "AWATER" "INTPTLAT"
          # [17] "INTPTLON"
          names(carribbean)
          # [1] "F_CODE" "NAM" "NA2" "NA2_DESCRI" "NA3" "NA3_DESCRI" "WFBPATHLN"
          # [8] "AREA" "PERIMETER"


          However,



          raster:::union(US_counties, carribbean)


          now works and shows no warnings.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks for the answer Julius! When I try to replicate your code, I get this error from the union method call: Error in as.vector(x) : no method for coercing this S4 class to a vector. Is it because of a package I am missing?

            – Alan
            Nov 20 '18 at 1:51






          • 1





            @Alan, see the update. It was actually more about too many packages rather than missing something.

            – Julius Vainora
            Nov 20 '18 at 2:22











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53378845%2fr-merging-map-shapefiles-together%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          Firstly, the error when using union seems to arise due to conflicting packages. In particular, not the right function union is being called. Using



          raster:::union(US_counties, carribbean)


          gives



          Warning message:
          In union(US_counties, carribbean) : non identical CRS


          which possibly is an important warning and says the same as when trying to use `rbind. Perhaps you know more about CRS (Coordinate Reference Systems) than me, but the problem is that



          proj4string(carribbean)
          # [1] "+proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0"
          proj4string(US_counties)
          # [1] "+proj=longlat +datum=NAD83 +no_defs +ellps=GRS80 +towgs84=0,0,0"


          So, not very surprisingly, the two shape files are of somewhat different formats. With the help of this useful read we see that it's not hard to unify those formats, after all. E.g.,



          library(sp)
          carribbean <- spTransform(carribbean, proj4string(US_counties))


          Then



          rbind(US_counties, carribbean, makeUniqueIDs = TRUE)
          # Error in rbind(deparse.level, ...) :
          # numbers of columns of arguments do not match


          still doesn't work, but the problem is clear given that we are trying to bind different variables



          names(US_counties)
          # [1] "STATEFP" "COUNTYFP" "COUNTYNS" "GEOID" "NAME" "NAMELSAD" "LSAD" "CLASSFP"
          # [9] "MTFCC" "CSAFP" "CBSAFP" "METDIVFP" "FUNCSTAT" "ALAND" "AWATER" "INTPTLAT"
          # [17] "INTPTLON"
          names(carribbean)
          # [1] "F_CODE" "NAM" "NA2" "NA2_DESCRI" "NA3" "NA3_DESCRI" "WFBPATHLN"
          # [8] "AREA" "PERIMETER"


          However,



          raster:::union(US_counties, carribbean)


          now works and shows no warnings.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks for the answer Julius! When I try to replicate your code, I get this error from the union method call: Error in as.vector(x) : no method for coercing this S4 class to a vector. Is it because of a package I am missing?

            – Alan
            Nov 20 '18 at 1:51






          • 1





            @Alan, see the update. It was actually more about too many packages rather than missing something.

            – Julius Vainora
            Nov 20 '18 at 2:22
















          2














          Firstly, the error when using union seems to arise due to conflicting packages. In particular, not the right function union is being called. Using



          raster:::union(US_counties, carribbean)


          gives



          Warning message:
          In union(US_counties, carribbean) : non identical CRS


          which possibly is an important warning and says the same as when trying to use `rbind. Perhaps you know more about CRS (Coordinate Reference Systems) than me, but the problem is that



          proj4string(carribbean)
          # [1] "+proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0"
          proj4string(US_counties)
          # [1] "+proj=longlat +datum=NAD83 +no_defs +ellps=GRS80 +towgs84=0,0,0"


          So, not very surprisingly, the two shape files are of somewhat different formats. With the help of this useful read we see that it's not hard to unify those formats, after all. E.g.,



          library(sp)
          carribbean <- spTransform(carribbean, proj4string(US_counties))


          Then



          rbind(US_counties, carribbean, makeUniqueIDs = TRUE)
          # Error in rbind(deparse.level, ...) :
          # numbers of columns of arguments do not match


          still doesn't work, but the problem is clear given that we are trying to bind different variables



          names(US_counties)
          # [1] "STATEFP" "COUNTYFP" "COUNTYNS" "GEOID" "NAME" "NAMELSAD" "LSAD" "CLASSFP"
          # [9] "MTFCC" "CSAFP" "CBSAFP" "METDIVFP" "FUNCSTAT" "ALAND" "AWATER" "INTPTLAT"
          # [17] "INTPTLON"
          names(carribbean)
          # [1] "F_CODE" "NAM" "NA2" "NA2_DESCRI" "NA3" "NA3_DESCRI" "WFBPATHLN"
          # [8] "AREA" "PERIMETER"


          However,



          raster:::union(US_counties, carribbean)


          now works and shows no warnings.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Thanks for the answer Julius! When I try to replicate your code, I get this error from the union method call: Error in as.vector(x) : no method for coercing this S4 class to a vector. Is it because of a package I am missing?

            – Alan
            Nov 20 '18 at 1:51






          • 1





            @Alan, see the update. It was actually more about too many packages rather than missing something.

            – Julius Vainora
            Nov 20 '18 at 2:22














          2












          2








          2







          Firstly, the error when using union seems to arise due to conflicting packages. In particular, not the right function union is being called. Using



          raster:::union(US_counties, carribbean)


          gives



          Warning message:
          In union(US_counties, carribbean) : non identical CRS


          which possibly is an important warning and says the same as when trying to use `rbind. Perhaps you know more about CRS (Coordinate Reference Systems) than me, but the problem is that



          proj4string(carribbean)
          # [1] "+proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0"
          proj4string(US_counties)
          # [1] "+proj=longlat +datum=NAD83 +no_defs +ellps=GRS80 +towgs84=0,0,0"


          So, not very surprisingly, the two shape files are of somewhat different formats. With the help of this useful read we see that it's not hard to unify those formats, after all. E.g.,



          library(sp)
          carribbean <- spTransform(carribbean, proj4string(US_counties))


          Then



          rbind(US_counties, carribbean, makeUniqueIDs = TRUE)
          # Error in rbind(deparse.level, ...) :
          # numbers of columns of arguments do not match


          still doesn't work, but the problem is clear given that we are trying to bind different variables



          names(US_counties)
          # [1] "STATEFP" "COUNTYFP" "COUNTYNS" "GEOID" "NAME" "NAMELSAD" "LSAD" "CLASSFP"
          # [9] "MTFCC" "CSAFP" "CBSAFP" "METDIVFP" "FUNCSTAT" "ALAND" "AWATER" "INTPTLAT"
          # [17] "INTPTLON"
          names(carribbean)
          # [1] "F_CODE" "NAM" "NA2" "NA2_DESCRI" "NA3" "NA3_DESCRI" "WFBPATHLN"
          # [8] "AREA" "PERIMETER"


          However,



          raster:::union(US_counties, carribbean)


          now works and shows no warnings.






          share|improve this answer















          Firstly, the error when using union seems to arise due to conflicting packages. In particular, not the right function union is being called. Using



          raster:::union(US_counties, carribbean)


          gives



          Warning message:
          In union(US_counties, carribbean) : non identical CRS


          which possibly is an important warning and says the same as when trying to use `rbind. Perhaps you know more about CRS (Coordinate Reference Systems) than me, but the problem is that



          proj4string(carribbean)
          # [1] "+proj=longlat +datum=WGS84 +no_defs +ellps=WGS84 +towgs84=0,0,0"
          proj4string(US_counties)
          # [1] "+proj=longlat +datum=NAD83 +no_defs +ellps=GRS80 +towgs84=0,0,0"


          So, not very surprisingly, the two shape files are of somewhat different formats. With the help of this useful read we see that it's not hard to unify those formats, after all. E.g.,



          library(sp)
          carribbean <- spTransform(carribbean, proj4string(US_counties))


          Then



          rbind(US_counties, carribbean, makeUniqueIDs = TRUE)
          # Error in rbind(deparse.level, ...) :
          # numbers of columns of arguments do not match


          still doesn't work, but the problem is clear given that we are trying to bind different variables



          names(US_counties)
          # [1] "STATEFP" "COUNTYFP" "COUNTYNS" "GEOID" "NAME" "NAMELSAD" "LSAD" "CLASSFP"
          # [9] "MTFCC" "CSAFP" "CBSAFP" "METDIVFP" "FUNCSTAT" "ALAND" "AWATER" "INTPTLAT"
          # [17] "INTPTLON"
          names(carribbean)
          # [1] "F_CODE" "NAM" "NA2" "NA2_DESCRI" "NA3" "NA3_DESCRI" "WFBPATHLN"
          # [8] "AREA" "PERIMETER"


          However,



          raster:::union(US_counties, carribbean)


          now works and shows no warnings.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 20 '18 at 2:21

























          answered Nov 19 '18 at 18:33









          Julius VainoraJulius Vainora

          36.8k76481




          36.8k76481













          • Thanks for the answer Julius! When I try to replicate your code, I get this error from the union method call: Error in as.vector(x) : no method for coercing this S4 class to a vector. Is it because of a package I am missing?

            – Alan
            Nov 20 '18 at 1:51






          • 1





            @Alan, see the update. It was actually more about too many packages rather than missing something.

            – Julius Vainora
            Nov 20 '18 at 2:22



















          • Thanks for the answer Julius! When I try to replicate your code, I get this error from the union method call: Error in as.vector(x) : no method for coercing this S4 class to a vector. Is it because of a package I am missing?

            – Alan
            Nov 20 '18 at 1:51






          • 1





            @Alan, see the update. It was actually more about too many packages rather than missing something.

            – Julius Vainora
            Nov 20 '18 at 2:22

















          Thanks for the answer Julius! When I try to replicate your code, I get this error from the union method call: Error in as.vector(x) : no method for coercing this S4 class to a vector. Is it because of a package I am missing?

          – Alan
          Nov 20 '18 at 1:51





          Thanks for the answer Julius! When I try to replicate your code, I get this error from the union method call: Error in as.vector(x) : no method for coercing this S4 class to a vector. Is it because of a package I am missing?

          – Alan
          Nov 20 '18 at 1:51




          1




          1





          @Alan, see the update. It was actually more about too many packages rather than missing something.

          – Julius Vainora
          Nov 20 '18 at 2:22





          @Alan, see the update. It was actually more about too many packages rather than missing something.

          – Julius Vainora
          Nov 20 '18 at 2:22


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53378845%2fr-merging-map-shapefiles-together%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          鏡平學校

          ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

          Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?