C# sort string alphabetically followed by frequency of occurrence












2















I just started learning lambda/linq. Here's what I have so far.



var frequency = from f in "trreill".ToList()
group f by f into letterfrequency
select letterfrequency;

foreach (var f in frequency)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count()}");
}


Here is the output:




t1 r2 e1 i1 l2




Output needed:




e1i1l2r2t1




Can't figure out how to sort properly. Any thoughts to what I'm doing wrong?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    frequency = frequency.OrderBy(x => x.Count);

    – Ryan Wilson
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:58











  • You simply want to order by letterfrequency.Key, then by letterfrequency.Count()? Given your grouping, the latter will not matter.

    – CodeCaster
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:59








  • 5





    Can you explain why you wrote an unnecessary ToList in there? I am interested to learn why people write unnecessary code because it helps me design APIs that lead developers to avoid writing unnecessary code.

    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:04











  • By "followed by" do you mean print out the key and then follow it by the count? Or do you mean that the ordering relation depends on the count? If the latter, how does that ever make a difference?

    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:08






  • 1





    The ToList() was one of the ways I was trying sort, originally, because I couldn't get it to work properly. I know, bad coding but I'm trying:) Many thanks

    – MBrewers
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:53
















2















I just started learning lambda/linq. Here's what I have so far.



var frequency = from f in "trreill".ToList()
group f by f into letterfrequency
select letterfrequency;

foreach (var f in frequency)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count()}");
}


Here is the output:




t1 r2 e1 i1 l2




Output needed:




e1i1l2r2t1




Can't figure out how to sort properly. Any thoughts to what I'm doing wrong?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    frequency = frequency.OrderBy(x => x.Count);

    – Ryan Wilson
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:58











  • You simply want to order by letterfrequency.Key, then by letterfrequency.Count()? Given your grouping, the latter will not matter.

    – CodeCaster
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:59








  • 5





    Can you explain why you wrote an unnecessary ToList in there? I am interested to learn why people write unnecessary code because it helps me design APIs that lead developers to avoid writing unnecessary code.

    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:04











  • By "followed by" do you mean print out the key and then follow it by the count? Or do you mean that the ordering relation depends on the count? If the latter, how does that ever make a difference?

    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:08






  • 1





    The ToList() was one of the ways I was trying sort, originally, because I couldn't get it to work properly. I know, bad coding but I'm trying:) Many thanks

    – MBrewers
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:53














2












2








2








I just started learning lambda/linq. Here's what I have so far.



var frequency = from f in "trreill".ToList()
group f by f into letterfrequency
select letterfrequency;

foreach (var f in frequency)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count()}");
}


Here is the output:




t1 r2 e1 i1 l2




Output needed:




e1i1l2r2t1




Can't figure out how to sort properly. Any thoughts to what I'm doing wrong?










share|improve this question
















I just started learning lambda/linq. Here's what I have so far.



var frequency = from f in "trreill".ToList()
group f by f into letterfrequency
select letterfrequency;

foreach (var f in frequency)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count()}");
}


Here is the output:




t1 r2 e1 i1 l2




Output needed:




e1i1l2r2t1




Can't figure out how to sort properly. Any thoughts to what I'm doing wrong?







c# linq






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 20 '18 at 14:59









Dayan

4,26583064




4,26583064










asked Nov 20 '18 at 14:56









MBrewersMBrewers

617




617








  • 1





    frequency = frequency.OrderBy(x => x.Count);

    – Ryan Wilson
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:58











  • You simply want to order by letterfrequency.Key, then by letterfrequency.Count()? Given your grouping, the latter will not matter.

    – CodeCaster
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:59








  • 5





    Can you explain why you wrote an unnecessary ToList in there? I am interested to learn why people write unnecessary code because it helps me design APIs that lead developers to avoid writing unnecessary code.

    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:04











  • By "followed by" do you mean print out the key and then follow it by the count? Or do you mean that the ordering relation depends on the count? If the latter, how does that ever make a difference?

    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:08






  • 1





    The ToList() was one of the ways I was trying sort, originally, because I couldn't get it to work properly. I know, bad coding but I'm trying:) Many thanks

    – MBrewers
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:53














  • 1





    frequency = frequency.OrderBy(x => x.Count);

    – Ryan Wilson
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:58











  • You simply want to order by letterfrequency.Key, then by letterfrequency.Count()? Given your grouping, the latter will not matter.

    – CodeCaster
    Nov 20 '18 at 14:59








  • 5





    Can you explain why you wrote an unnecessary ToList in there? I am interested to learn why people write unnecessary code because it helps me design APIs that lead developers to avoid writing unnecessary code.

    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:04











  • By "followed by" do you mean print out the key and then follow it by the count? Or do you mean that the ordering relation depends on the count? If the latter, how does that ever make a difference?

    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:08






  • 1





    The ToList() was one of the ways I was trying sort, originally, because I couldn't get it to work properly. I know, bad coding but I'm trying:) Many thanks

    – MBrewers
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:53








1




1





frequency = frequency.OrderBy(x => x.Count);

– Ryan Wilson
Nov 20 '18 at 14:58





frequency = frequency.OrderBy(x => x.Count);

– Ryan Wilson
Nov 20 '18 at 14:58













You simply want to order by letterfrequency.Key, then by letterfrequency.Count()? Given your grouping, the latter will not matter.

– CodeCaster
Nov 20 '18 at 14:59







You simply want to order by letterfrequency.Key, then by letterfrequency.Count()? Given your grouping, the latter will not matter.

– CodeCaster
Nov 20 '18 at 14:59






5




5





Can you explain why you wrote an unnecessary ToList in there? I am interested to learn why people write unnecessary code because it helps me design APIs that lead developers to avoid writing unnecessary code.

– Eric Lippert
Nov 20 '18 at 15:04





Can you explain why you wrote an unnecessary ToList in there? I am interested to learn why people write unnecessary code because it helps me design APIs that lead developers to avoid writing unnecessary code.

– Eric Lippert
Nov 20 '18 at 15:04













By "followed by" do you mean print out the key and then follow it by the count? Or do you mean that the ordering relation depends on the count? If the latter, how does that ever make a difference?

– Eric Lippert
Nov 20 '18 at 15:08





By "followed by" do you mean print out the key and then follow it by the count? Or do you mean that the ordering relation depends on the count? If the latter, how does that ever make a difference?

– Eric Lippert
Nov 20 '18 at 15:08




1




1





The ToList() was one of the ways I was trying sort, originally, because I couldn't get it to work properly. I know, bad coding but I'm trying:) Many thanks

– MBrewers
Nov 20 '18 at 15:53





The ToList() was one of the ways I was trying sort, originally, because I couldn't get it to work properly. I know, bad coding but I'm trying:) Many thanks

– MBrewers
Nov 20 '18 at 15:53












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6














The thing you're missing is adding an orderby to your LINQ statement:



var frequency = from f in "trreill"
group f by f into letterfrequency
orderby letterfrequency.Key
select new
{
Letter = letterfrequency.Key,
Frequency = letterfrequency.Count()
};

foreach (var f in frequency)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{f.Letter}{f.Frequency}");
}


The letterfrequency has a property called Key which contains the letter for each group, so adding orderby letterfrequency.Key sorts the results to give you the output you're after:




e1



i1



l2



r2



t1




I've also tweaked the result of the query slightly (simply to show that it's something that's possible) to generate a new anonymous type that contains the Letter and the Frequency as named properties. This makes the code in the Console.WriteLine a littl clearer as the properties being used are called Letter and Frequency rather than Key and the Count() method.



Turning it up to 11, using C# 7.0 Tuples



If you're using C# 7.0, you could replace the use of an anonymous type with Tuples, that means that the code would now look like this:



var frequency = from f in "trreill"
group f by f into letterfrequency
orderby letterfrequency.Key
select
(
Letter: letterfrequency.Key,
Frequency: letterfrequency.Count()
);


foreach (var (Letter, Frequency) in frequency)
{
Console.WriteLine($"{Letter}{Frequency}");
}


I've blogged about this, and there are plenty of other resources that describe them, including this Stackoverflow question that asks 'Are C# anonymous types redundant in C# 7', if you want a deeper dive into Tuples, what they are, how they work and why/when you might want to use them in preference to anonymous types.






share|improve this answer


























  • .ToList() is redundant

    – Dmitry Bychenko
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:06






  • 2





    Though this is good, it could be improved in two small ways. (1) remove the unnecessary ToList, and (2) in C# 7, select into a tuple rather than an anonymous type.

    – Eric Lippert
    Nov 20 '18 at 15:09



















2














Just sort your list as following:



        foreach (var f in frequency.OrderBy(item=>item.Key))
{
Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count()}");
}





share|improve this answer































    1














    I would select into an anonymous object:



    var frequency = from f in "trreill"
    group f by f into letterfrequency
    select new { Key = letterfrequency.Key, Count = letterfrequency.Count() };


    Then I would order it like so:



    foreach (var f in frequency.OrderBy(x => x.Key))
    {
    Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count}");
    }





    share|improve this answer


























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      });
      });
      }, "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53395709%2fc-sharp-sort-string-alphabetically-followed-by-frequency-of-occurrence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      6














      The thing you're missing is adding an orderby to your LINQ statement:



      var frequency = from f in "trreill"
      group f by f into letterfrequency
      orderby letterfrequency.Key
      select new
      {
      Letter = letterfrequency.Key,
      Frequency = letterfrequency.Count()
      };

      foreach (var f in frequency)
      {
      Console.WriteLine($"{f.Letter}{f.Frequency}");
      }


      The letterfrequency has a property called Key which contains the letter for each group, so adding orderby letterfrequency.Key sorts the results to give you the output you're after:




      e1



      i1



      l2



      r2



      t1




      I've also tweaked the result of the query slightly (simply to show that it's something that's possible) to generate a new anonymous type that contains the Letter and the Frequency as named properties. This makes the code in the Console.WriteLine a littl clearer as the properties being used are called Letter and Frequency rather than Key and the Count() method.



      Turning it up to 11, using C# 7.0 Tuples



      If you're using C# 7.0, you could replace the use of an anonymous type with Tuples, that means that the code would now look like this:



      var frequency = from f in "trreill"
      group f by f into letterfrequency
      orderby letterfrequency.Key
      select
      (
      Letter: letterfrequency.Key,
      Frequency: letterfrequency.Count()
      );


      foreach (var (Letter, Frequency) in frequency)
      {
      Console.WriteLine($"{Letter}{Frequency}");
      }


      I've blogged about this, and there are plenty of other resources that describe them, including this Stackoverflow question that asks 'Are C# anonymous types redundant in C# 7', if you want a deeper dive into Tuples, what they are, how they work and why/when you might want to use them in preference to anonymous types.






      share|improve this answer


























      • .ToList() is redundant

        – Dmitry Bychenko
        Nov 20 '18 at 15:06






      • 2





        Though this is good, it could be improved in two small ways. (1) remove the unnecessary ToList, and (2) in C# 7, select into a tuple rather than an anonymous type.

        – Eric Lippert
        Nov 20 '18 at 15:09
















      6














      The thing you're missing is adding an orderby to your LINQ statement:



      var frequency = from f in "trreill"
      group f by f into letterfrequency
      orderby letterfrequency.Key
      select new
      {
      Letter = letterfrequency.Key,
      Frequency = letterfrequency.Count()
      };

      foreach (var f in frequency)
      {
      Console.WriteLine($"{f.Letter}{f.Frequency}");
      }


      The letterfrequency has a property called Key which contains the letter for each group, so adding orderby letterfrequency.Key sorts the results to give you the output you're after:




      e1



      i1



      l2



      r2



      t1




      I've also tweaked the result of the query slightly (simply to show that it's something that's possible) to generate a new anonymous type that contains the Letter and the Frequency as named properties. This makes the code in the Console.WriteLine a littl clearer as the properties being used are called Letter and Frequency rather than Key and the Count() method.



      Turning it up to 11, using C# 7.0 Tuples



      If you're using C# 7.0, you could replace the use of an anonymous type with Tuples, that means that the code would now look like this:



      var frequency = from f in "trreill"
      group f by f into letterfrequency
      orderby letterfrequency.Key
      select
      (
      Letter: letterfrequency.Key,
      Frequency: letterfrequency.Count()
      );


      foreach (var (Letter, Frequency) in frequency)
      {
      Console.WriteLine($"{Letter}{Frequency}");
      }


      I've blogged about this, and there are plenty of other resources that describe them, including this Stackoverflow question that asks 'Are C# anonymous types redundant in C# 7', if you want a deeper dive into Tuples, what they are, how they work and why/when you might want to use them in preference to anonymous types.






      share|improve this answer


























      • .ToList() is redundant

        – Dmitry Bychenko
        Nov 20 '18 at 15:06






      • 2





        Though this is good, it could be improved in two small ways. (1) remove the unnecessary ToList, and (2) in C# 7, select into a tuple rather than an anonymous type.

        – Eric Lippert
        Nov 20 '18 at 15:09














      6












      6








      6







      The thing you're missing is adding an orderby to your LINQ statement:



      var frequency = from f in "trreill"
      group f by f into letterfrequency
      orderby letterfrequency.Key
      select new
      {
      Letter = letterfrequency.Key,
      Frequency = letterfrequency.Count()
      };

      foreach (var f in frequency)
      {
      Console.WriteLine($"{f.Letter}{f.Frequency}");
      }


      The letterfrequency has a property called Key which contains the letter for each group, so adding orderby letterfrequency.Key sorts the results to give you the output you're after:




      e1



      i1



      l2



      r2



      t1




      I've also tweaked the result of the query slightly (simply to show that it's something that's possible) to generate a new anonymous type that contains the Letter and the Frequency as named properties. This makes the code in the Console.WriteLine a littl clearer as the properties being used are called Letter and Frequency rather than Key and the Count() method.



      Turning it up to 11, using C# 7.0 Tuples



      If you're using C# 7.0, you could replace the use of an anonymous type with Tuples, that means that the code would now look like this:



      var frequency = from f in "trreill"
      group f by f into letterfrequency
      orderby letterfrequency.Key
      select
      (
      Letter: letterfrequency.Key,
      Frequency: letterfrequency.Count()
      );


      foreach (var (Letter, Frequency) in frequency)
      {
      Console.WriteLine($"{Letter}{Frequency}");
      }


      I've blogged about this, and there are plenty of other resources that describe them, including this Stackoverflow question that asks 'Are C# anonymous types redundant in C# 7', if you want a deeper dive into Tuples, what they are, how they work and why/when you might want to use them in preference to anonymous types.






      share|improve this answer















      The thing you're missing is adding an orderby to your LINQ statement:



      var frequency = from f in "trreill"
      group f by f into letterfrequency
      orderby letterfrequency.Key
      select new
      {
      Letter = letterfrequency.Key,
      Frequency = letterfrequency.Count()
      };

      foreach (var f in frequency)
      {
      Console.WriteLine($"{f.Letter}{f.Frequency}");
      }


      The letterfrequency has a property called Key which contains the letter for each group, so adding orderby letterfrequency.Key sorts the results to give you the output you're after:




      e1



      i1



      l2



      r2



      t1




      I've also tweaked the result of the query slightly (simply to show that it's something that's possible) to generate a new anonymous type that contains the Letter and the Frequency as named properties. This makes the code in the Console.WriteLine a littl clearer as the properties being used are called Letter and Frequency rather than Key and the Count() method.



      Turning it up to 11, using C# 7.0 Tuples



      If you're using C# 7.0, you could replace the use of an anonymous type with Tuples, that means that the code would now look like this:



      var frequency = from f in "trreill"
      group f by f into letterfrequency
      orderby letterfrequency.Key
      select
      (
      Letter: letterfrequency.Key,
      Frequency: letterfrequency.Count()
      );


      foreach (var (Letter, Frequency) in frequency)
      {
      Console.WriteLine($"{Letter}{Frequency}");
      }


      I've blogged about this, and there are plenty of other resources that describe them, including this Stackoverflow question that asks 'Are C# anonymous types redundant in C# 7', if you want a deeper dive into Tuples, what they are, how they work and why/when you might want to use them in preference to anonymous types.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Nov 22 '18 at 6:27

























      answered Nov 20 '18 at 15:00









      RobRob

      37.7k21103131




      37.7k21103131













      • .ToList() is redundant

        – Dmitry Bychenko
        Nov 20 '18 at 15:06






      • 2





        Though this is good, it could be improved in two small ways. (1) remove the unnecessary ToList, and (2) in C# 7, select into a tuple rather than an anonymous type.

        – Eric Lippert
        Nov 20 '18 at 15:09



















      • .ToList() is redundant

        – Dmitry Bychenko
        Nov 20 '18 at 15:06






      • 2





        Though this is good, it could be improved in two small ways. (1) remove the unnecessary ToList, and (2) in C# 7, select into a tuple rather than an anonymous type.

        – Eric Lippert
        Nov 20 '18 at 15:09

















      .ToList() is redundant

      – Dmitry Bychenko
      Nov 20 '18 at 15:06





      .ToList() is redundant

      – Dmitry Bychenko
      Nov 20 '18 at 15:06




      2




      2





      Though this is good, it could be improved in two small ways. (1) remove the unnecessary ToList, and (2) in C# 7, select into a tuple rather than an anonymous type.

      – Eric Lippert
      Nov 20 '18 at 15:09





      Though this is good, it could be improved in two small ways. (1) remove the unnecessary ToList, and (2) in C# 7, select into a tuple rather than an anonymous type.

      – Eric Lippert
      Nov 20 '18 at 15:09













      2














      Just sort your list as following:



              foreach (var f in frequency.OrderBy(item=>item.Key))
      {
      Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count()}");
      }





      share|improve this answer




























        2














        Just sort your list as following:



                foreach (var f in frequency.OrderBy(item=>item.Key))
        {
        Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count()}");
        }





        share|improve this answer


























          2












          2








          2







          Just sort your list as following:



                  foreach (var f in frequency.OrderBy(item=>item.Key))
          {
          Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count()}");
          }





          share|improve this answer













          Just sort your list as following:



                  foreach (var f in frequency.OrderBy(item=>item.Key))
          {
          Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count()}");
          }






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 20 '18 at 15:02









          Ehsan.SaradarEhsan.Saradar

          46338




          46338























              1














              I would select into an anonymous object:



              var frequency = from f in "trreill"
              group f by f into letterfrequency
              select new { Key = letterfrequency.Key, Count = letterfrequency.Count() };


              Then I would order it like so:



              foreach (var f in frequency.OrderBy(x => x.Key))
              {
              Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count}");
              }





              share|improve this answer






























                1














                I would select into an anonymous object:



                var frequency = from f in "trreill"
                group f by f into letterfrequency
                select new { Key = letterfrequency.Key, Count = letterfrequency.Count() };


                Then I would order it like so:



                foreach (var f in frequency.OrderBy(x => x.Key))
                {
                Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count}");
                }





                share|improve this answer




























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  I would select into an anonymous object:



                  var frequency = from f in "trreill"
                  group f by f into letterfrequency
                  select new { Key = letterfrequency.Key, Count = letterfrequency.Count() };


                  Then I would order it like so:



                  foreach (var f in frequency.OrderBy(x => x.Key))
                  {
                  Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count}");
                  }





                  share|improve this answer















                  I would select into an anonymous object:



                  var frequency = from f in "trreill"
                  group f by f into letterfrequency
                  select new { Key = letterfrequency.Key, Count = letterfrequency.Count() };


                  Then I would order it like so:



                  foreach (var f in frequency.OrderBy(x => x.Key))
                  {
                  Console.WriteLine($"{f.Key}{f.Count}");
                  }






                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Nov 20 '18 at 15:06

























                  answered Nov 20 '18 at 15:02









                  Thomas SchremserThomas Schremser

                  1,79762128




                  1,79762128






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53395709%2fc-sharp-sort-string-alphabetically-followed-by-frequency-of-occurrence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      鏡平學校

                      ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

                      Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?