Add to SQS from Lambda without SNS?

Is there a simple way for me to add to an AWS SQS queue from an AWS lambda?

From my google search research findings, it seems that the suggested workflow is to publish to an SNS topic, which can then push the message to the queue.

Question: Is there a reason to use SNS on top of SQS instead of using SQS only?

Context (FYI):
My scenario is that I am using SQS as a logger queue. I need to push logs to this queue from a lambda.

edited Nov 16 at 17:21

asked Nov 13 at 16:59

James Wierzba

6,48742761

1

Yes, you can do that. You have to send a message to SQS via lambda. You don't need to set up SNS -> SQS. If you want to do that with node js sdk then I can provide a snippet. Just let me know!
– Nikolay Vetrov
Nov 13 at 20:14

I thought that SNS on top of the SQS is just to improve the flexibility. The SNS can send the message to multiple AWS services (SQS) at once.
– ChouW
Nov 16 at 7:50

@ChouW Yeah that is certainly a benefit, without adding too much complexity. In fact, considering how simple it is to send SNS from Lambda compared to pushing messages directly to SQS (requires explicit authN), using SNS might even be a simpler approach
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:21

add a comment |

Is there a simple way for me to add to an AWS SQS queue from an AWS lambda?

From my google search research findings, it seems that the suggested workflow is to publish to an SNS topic, which can then push the message to the queue.

Question: Is there a reason to use SNS on top of SQS instead of using SQS only?

Context (FYI):
My scenario is that I am using SQS as a logger queue. I need to push logs to this queue from a lambda.

edited Nov 16 at 17:21

asked Nov 13 at 16:59

James Wierzba

6,48742761

1

Yes, you can do that. You have to send a message to SQS via lambda. You don't need to set up SNS -> SQS. If you want to do that with node js sdk then I can provide a snippet. Just let me know!
– Nikolay Vetrov
Nov 13 at 20:14

I thought that SNS on top of the SQS is just to improve the flexibility. The SNS can send the message to multiple AWS services (SQS) at once.
– ChouW
Nov 16 at 7:50

@ChouW Yeah that is certainly a benefit, without adding too much complexity. In fact, considering how simple it is to send SNS from Lambda compared to pushing messages directly to SQS (requires explicit authN), using SNS might even be a simpler approach
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:21

add a comment |

Is there a simple way for me to add to an AWS SQS queue from an AWS lambda?

From my google search research findings, it seems that the suggested workflow is to publish to an SNS topic, which can then push the message to the queue.

Question: Is there a reason to use SNS on top of SQS instead of using SQS only?

Context (FYI):
My scenario is that I am using SQS as a logger queue. I need to push logs to this queue from a lambda.

edited Nov 16 at 17:21

asked Nov 13 at 16:59

James Wierzba

6,48742761

Is there a simple way for me to add to an AWS SQS queue from an AWS lambda?

From my google search research findings, it seems that the suggested workflow is to publish to an SNS topic, which can then push the message to the queue.

Question: Is there a reason to use SNS on top of SQS instead of using SQS only?

Context (FYI):
My scenario is that I am using SQS as a logger queue. I need to push logs to this queue from a lambda.

amazon-web-services aws-lambda amazon-sqs amazon-sns

edited Nov 16 at 17:21

asked Nov 13 at 16:59

James Wierzba

6,48742761

edited Nov 16 at 17:21

asked Nov 13 at 16:59

James Wierzba

6,48742761

edited Nov 16 at 17:21

asked Nov 13 at 16:59

James Wierzba

6,48742761

asked Nov 13 at 16:59

James Wierzba

6,48742761

asked Nov 13 at 16:59

James Wierzba

6,48742761

1

Yes, you can do that. You have to send a message to SQS via lambda. You don't need to set up SNS -> SQS. If you want to do that with node js sdk then I can provide a snippet. Just let me know!
– Nikolay Vetrov
Nov 13 at 20:14

I thought that SNS on top of the SQS is just to improve the flexibility. The SNS can send the message to multiple AWS services (SQS) at once.
– ChouW
Nov 16 at 7:50

@ChouW Yeah that is certainly a benefit, without adding too much complexity. In fact, considering how simple it is to send SNS from Lambda compared to pushing messages directly to SQS (requires explicit authN), using SNS might even be a simpler approach
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:21

add a comment |

1

Yes, you can do that. You have to send a message to SQS via lambda. You don't need to set up SNS -> SQS. If you want to do that with node js sdk then I can provide a snippet. Just let me know!
– Nikolay Vetrov
Nov 13 at 20:14

I thought that SNS on top of the SQS is just to improve the flexibility. The SNS can send the message to multiple AWS services (SQS) at once.
– ChouW
Nov 16 at 7:50

@ChouW Yeah that is certainly a benefit, without adding too much complexity. In fact, considering how simple it is to send SNS from Lambda compared to pushing messages directly to SQS (requires explicit authN), using SNS might even be a simpler approach
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:21

Yes, you can do that. You have to send a message to SQS via lambda. You don't need to set up SNS -> SQS. If you want to do that with node js sdk then I can provide a snippet. Just let me know!
– Nikolay Vetrov
Nov 13 at 20:14

I thought that SNS on top of the SQS is just to improve the flexibility. The SNS can send the message to multiple AWS services (SQS) at once.
– ChouW
Nov 16 at 7:50

@ChouW Yeah that is certainly a benefit, without adding too much complexity. In fact, considering how simple it is to send SNS from Lambda compared to pushing messages directly to SQS (requires explicit authN), using SNS might even be a simpler approach
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:21

add a comment |

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

You can just use the AWS SDK to send your messages to your SQS queue. There is no magic here.

answered Nov 13 at 22:38

yoroto

692

That is only one part to my question.
– James Wierzba
Nov 14 at 15:56

I am asking what benefits are there to using SNS on top of SQS, and are these benefits worth the added complexity in the architecture
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:22

add a comment |

It is possible to push from Lambda to SQS, you can try and make sense of the code below not sure if its gonna help or not

 public async Task<string> FunctionHandler(ILambdaContext context, int count )

        {

            {

                StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(1024);

                using (StringWriter sr = new StringWriter(sb))



                {

                    try

                    {                  

                        var credentials = new BasicAWSCredentials("AWS_ACCESS_KEY", "AWS_SECRET_KEY");

                        var client = new AmazonSQSClient(credentials, RegionEndpoint.EUWest1);



                        SendMessageRequest request = new SendMessageRequest();

                        request.DelaySeconds = 0;

                        request.QueueUrl = "queue url";

                        request.MessageBody = "text of what you logging to SQS";

                        for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)

                        {

                            SendMessageResponse response = client.SendMessageAsync(request);

                        }

                    }

                    catch (Exception e)

                    {

                        throw e;

                    }

                    return "";

                }

            }

        }

edited Nov 15 at 10:03

answered Nov 15 at 9:57

Kid_Nick

4210

Do you have to import a library manually? Or is the library for sending messages to SQS already available in the lambda sandbox environment?
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:23

I use a nuget package for AWSSDK.SQS on .Net Core
– Kid_Nick
Nov 19 at 6:29

add a comment |

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});

}
});

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53286032%2fadd-to-sqs-from-lambda-without-sns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

You can just use the AWS SDK to send your messages to your SQS queue. There is no magic here.

answered Nov 13 at 22:38

yoroto

692

That is only one part to my question.
– James Wierzba
Nov 14 at 15:56

I am asking what benefits are there to using SNS on top of SQS, and are these benefits worth the added complexity in the architecture
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:22

add a comment |

You can just use the AWS SDK to send your messages to your SQS queue. There is no magic here.

answered Nov 13 at 22:38

yoroto

692

That is only one part to my question.
– James Wierzba
Nov 14 at 15:56

I am asking what benefits are there to using SNS on top of SQS, and are these benefits worth the added complexity in the architecture
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:22

add a comment |

You can just use the AWS SDK to send your messages to your SQS queue. There is no magic here.

answered Nov 13 at 22:38

yoroto

692

You can just use the AWS SDK to send your messages to your SQS queue. There is no magic here.

answered Nov 13 at 22:38

yoroto

692

answered Nov 13 at 22:38

yoroto

692

answered Nov 13 at 22:38

yoroto

692

answered Nov 13 at 22:38

yoroto

692

That is only one part to my question.
– James Wierzba
Nov 14 at 15:56

I am asking what benefits are there to using SNS on top of SQS, and are these benefits worth the added complexity in the architecture
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:22

add a comment |

That is only one part to my question.
– James Wierzba
Nov 14 at 15:56

I am asking what benefits are there to using SNS on top of SQS, and are these benefits worth the added complexity in the architecture
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:22

That is only one part to my question.
– James Wierzba
Nov 14 at 15:56

I am asking what benefits are there to using SNS on top of SQS, and are these benefits worth the added complexity in the architecture
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:22

add a comment |

It is possible to push from Lambda to SQS, you can try and make sense of the code below not sure if its gonna help or not

 public async Task<string> FunctionHandler(ILambdaContext context, int count )

        {

            {

                StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(1024);

                using (StringWriter sr = new StringWriter(sb))



                {

                    try

                    {                  

                        var credentials = new BasicAWSCredentials("AWS_ACCESS_KEY", "AWS_SECRET_KEY");

                        var client = new AmazonSQSClient(credentials, RegionEndpoint.EUWest1);



                        SendMessageRequest request = new SendMessageRequest();

                        request.DelaySeconds = 0;

                        request.QueueUrl = "queue url";

                        request.MessageBody = "text of what you logging to SQS";

                        for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)

                        {

                            SendMessageResponse response = client.SendMessageAsync(request);

                        }

                    }

                    catch (Exception e)

                    {

                        throw e;

                    }

                    return "";

                }

            }

        }

edited Nov 15 at 10:03

answered Nov 15 at 9:57

Kid_Nick

4210

Do you have to import a library manually? Or is the library for sending messages to SQS already available in the lambda sandbox environment?
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:23

I use a nuget package for AWSSDK.SQS on .Net Core
– Kid_Nick
Nov 19 at 6:29

add a comment |

It is possible to push from Lambda to SQS, you can try and make sense of the code below not sure if its gonna help or not

 public async Task<string> FunctionHandler(ILambdaContext context, int count )

        {

            {

                StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(1024);

                using (StringWriter sr = new StringWriter(sb))



                {

                    try

                    {                  

                        var credentials = new BasicAWSCredentials("AWS_ACCESS_KEY", "AWS_SECRET_KEY");

                        var client = new AmazonSQSClient(credentials, RegionEndpoint.EUWest1);



                        SendMessageRequest request = new SendMessageRequest();

                        request.DelaySeconds = 0;

                        request.QueueUrl = "queue url";

                        request.MessageBody = "text of what you logging to SQS";

                        for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)

                        {

                            SendMessageResponse response = client.SendMessageAsync(request);

                        }

                    }

                    catch (Exception e)

                    {

                        throw e;

                    }

                    return "";

                }

            }

        }

edited Nov 15 at 10:03

answered Nov 15 at 9:57

Kid_Nick

4210

Do you have to import a library manually? Or is the library for sending messages to SQS already available in the lambda sandbox environment?
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:23

I use a nuget package for AWSSDK.SQS on .Net Core
– Kid_Nick
Nov 19 at 6:29

add a comment |

It is possible to push from Lambda to SQS, you can try and make sense of the code below not sure if its gonna help or not

 public async Task<string> FunctionHandler(ILambdaContext context, int count )

        {

            {

                StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(1024);

                using (StringWriter sr = new StringWriter(sb))



                {

                    try

                    {                  

                        var credentials = new BasicAWSCredentials("AWS_ACCESS_KEY", "AWS_SECRET_KEY");

                        var client = new AmazonSQSClient(credentials, RegionEndpoint.EUWest1);



                        SendMessageRequest request = new SendMessageRequest();

                        request.DelaySeconds = 0;

                        request.QueueUrl = "queue url";

                        request.MessageBody = "text of what you logging to SQS";

                        for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)

                        {

                            SendMessageResponse response = client.SendMessageAsync(request);

                        }

                    }

                    catch (Exception e)

                    {

                        throw e;

                    }

                    return "";

                }

            }

        }

edited Nov 15 at 10:03

answered Nov 15 at 9:57

Kid_Nick

4210

It is possible to push from Lambda to SQS, you can try and make sense of the code below not sure if its gonna help or not

 public async Task<string> FunctionHandler(ILambdaContext context, int count )

        {

            {

                StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(1024);

                using (StringWriter sr = new StringWriter(sb))



                {

                    try

                    {                  

                        var credentials = new BasicAWSCredentials("AWS_ACCESS_KEY", "AWS_SECRET_KEY");

                        var client = new AmazonSQSClient(credentials, RegionEndpoint.EUWest1);



                        SendMessageRequest request = new SendMessageRequest();

                        request.DelaySeconds = 0;

                        request.QueueUrl = "queue url";

                        request.MessageBody = "text of what you logging to SQS";

                        for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)

                        {

                            SendMessageResponse response = client.SendMessageAsync(request);

                        }

                    }

                    catch (Exception e)

                    {

                        throw e;

                    }

                    return "";

                }

            }

        }

edited Nov 15 at 10:03

answered Nov 15 at 9:57

Kid_Nick

4210

edited Nov 15 at 10:03

answered Nov 15 at 9:57

Kid_Nick

4210

answered Nov 15 at 9:57

Kid_Nick

4210

answered Nov 15 at 9:57

Kid_Nick

4210

Do you have to import a library manually? Or is the library for sending messages to SQS already available in the lambda sandbox environment?
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:23

I use a nuget package for AWSSDK.SQS on .Net Core
– Kid_Nick
Nov 19 at 6:29

add a comment |

Do you have to import a library manually? Or is the library for sending messages to SQS already available in the lambda sandbox environment?
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:23

I use a nuget package for AWSSDK.SQS on .Net Core
– Kid_Nick
Nov 19 at 6:29

Do you have to import a library manually? Or is the library for sending messages to SQS already available in the lambda sandbox environment?
– James Wierzba
Nov 16 at 17:23

I use a nuget package for AWSSDK.SQS on .Net Core
– Kid_Nick
Nov 19 at 6:29

add a comment |

draft saved

draft discarded

Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.

Please pay close attention to the following guidance:

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Agfdhyk