Java hex calculation












1














I have the long value bits declared like so:



long bits = len*8L; (304)



System.out.println(bits); This outputs as 304



If I use the long name bits like so I get 0 & 0 respectively.



System.out.println(bits>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(bits>>(4*8)));


If I use the actual number, like so, I get 304 and 48 respectively



System.out.println(304>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(304>>(4*8)));


I'm trying to convert this Java to JavaScript but JavaScript gives me 304 and 48 in all scenarios. I need it to match the Java and give values of 0 & 0.



Any ideas?



EDIT



Follow up, just to be clear, I need the JavaScript equivalent to equal 0, mimicking how the Java currently does it (the two examples above that equal 0 won't be changed in what we're developing).



So console.log(0xFF&(bits>>(4*8))) should equal 0, it currently equates to 48










share|improve this question
























  • In Java, 304 is an int, so there is an implicit ((4*8)%32) for the number of bits to shift. bits is a long, so there is an implicit ((4*8)%64). JavaScript, I don't know...
    – Ken Y-N
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:28








  • 1




    And to followup on @KenY-N Javascript does all shifts as a 32bit number. So shifting by 32bits is ignored.
    – lod
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:31
















1














I have the long value bits declared like so:



long bits = len*8L; (304)



System.out.println(bits); This outputs as 304



If I use the long name bits like so I get 0 & 0 respectively.



System.out.println(bits>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(bits>>(4*8)));


If I use the actual number, like so, I get 304 and 48 respectively



System.out.println(304>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(304>>(4*8)));


I'm trying to convert this Java to JavaScript but JavaScript gives me 304 and 48 in all scenarios. I need it to match the Java and give values of 0 & 0.



Any ideas?



EDIT



Follow up, just to be clear, I need the JavaScript equivalent to equal 0, mimicking how the Java currently does it (the two examples above that equal 0 won't be changed in what we're developing).



So console.log(0xFF&(bits>>(4*8))) should equal 0, it currently equates to 48










share|improve this question
























  • In Java, 304 is an int, so there is an implicit ((4*8)%32) for the number of bits to shift. bits is a long, so there is an implicit ((4*8)%64). JavaScript, I don't know...
    – Ken Y-N
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:28








  • 1




    And to followup on @KenY-N Javascript does all shifts as a 32bit number. So shifting by 32bits is ignored.
    – lod
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:31














1












1








1







I have the long value bits declared like so:



long bits = len*8L; (304)



System.out.println(bits); This outputs as 304



If I use the long name bits like so I get 0 & 0 respectively.



System.out.println(bits>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(bits>>(4*8)));


If I use the actual number, like so, I get 304 and 48 respectively



System.out.println(304>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(304>>(4*8)));


I'm trying to convert this Java to JavaScript but JavaScript gives me 304 and 48 in all scenarios. I need it to match the Java and give values of 0 & 0.



Any ideas?



EDIT



Follow up, just to be clear, I need the JavaScript equivalent to equal 0, mimicking how the Java currently does it (the two examples above that equal 0 won't be changed in what we're developing).



So console.log(0xFF&(bits>>(4*8))) should equal 0, it currently equates to 48










share|improve this question















I have the long value bits declared like so:



long bits = len*8L; (304)



System.out.println(bits); This outputs as 304



If I use the long name bits like so I get 0 & 0 respectively.



System.out.println(bits>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(bits>>(4*8)));


If I use the actual number, like so, I get 304 and 48 respectively



System.out.println(304>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(304>>(4*8)));


I'm trying to convert this Java to JavaScript but JavaScript gives me 304 and 48 in all scenarios. I need it to match the Java and give values of 0 & 0.



Any ideas?



EDIT



Follow up, just to be clear, I need the JavaScript equivalent to equal 0, mimicking how the Java currently does it (the two examples above that equal 0 won't be changed in what we're developing).



So console.log(0xFF&(bits>>(4*8))) should equal 0, it currently equates to 48







javascript java hex long-integer calculation






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 14 '18 at 1:41

























asked Nov 14 '18 at 1:16









Dan James Palmer

93552050




93552050












  • In Java, 304 is an int, so there is an implicit ((4*8)%32) for the number of bits to shift. bits is a long, so there is an implicit ((4*8)%64). JavaScript, I don't know...
    – Ken Y-N
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:28








  • 1




    And to followup on @KenY-N Javascript does all shifts as a 32bit number. So shifting by 32bits is ignored.
    – lod
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:31


















  • In Java, 304 is an int, so there is an implicit ((4*8)%32) for the number of bits to shift. bits is a long, so there is an implicit ((4*8)%64). JavaScript, I don't know...
    – Ken Y-N
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:28








  • 1




    And to followup on @KenY-N Javascript does all shifts as a 32bit number. So shifting by 32bits is ignored.
    – lod
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:31
















In Java, 304 is an int, so there is an implicit ((4*8)%32) for the number of bits to shift. bits is a long, so there is an implicit ((4*8)%64). JavaScript, I don't know...
– Ken Y-N
Nov 14 '18 at 1:28






In Java, 304 is an int, so there is an implicit ((4*8)%32) for the number of bits to shift. bits is a long, so there is an implicit ((4*8)%64). JavaScript, I don't know...
– Ken Y-N
Nov 14 '18 at 1:28






1




1




And to followup on @KenY-N Javascript does all shifts as a 32bit number. So shifting by 32bits is ignored.
– lod
Nov 14 '18 at 1:31




And to followup on @KenY-N Javascript does all shifts as a 32bit number. So shifting by 32bits is ignored.
– lod
Nov 14 '18 at 1:31












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














The JLS, Section 15.19 covers shifting operators in Java.




If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is int, then only the five lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & (§15.22.1) with the mask value 0x1f (0b11111). The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range 0 to 31, inclusive.




For an int value such as 304, the bit shift value of 4*8, or 32, is really 0, so no shifting takes place. Then a bit-and with 0xFF yields 48.




If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is long, then only the six lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & (§15.22.1) with the mask value 0x3f (0b111111). The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range 0 to 63, inclusive.




For a long value, the bit shift value of 4*8 really does shift to the right 32 bits, which yields 0.



This page covers JavaScript bit-shift operators.




Bitwise operators treat their operands as a sequence of 32 bits (zeroes and ones), rather than as decimal, hexadecimal, or octal numbers.




It appears that JavaScript converts the number to a 32-bit number, like a Java int. It also appears that the same "only the least 5 bits" rule applies to the shift operand in JavaScript also.






console.log(304>>32);        // Don't shift!
console.log(0xFF&(304>>32)); // Don't shift!
console.log(304>>33); // Shift by 1, not 33
console.log(0xFF&(304>>33)); // Shift by 1, not 33








share|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for the answer, I'll check out the JavaScript bit-shift operators. I need the JavaScript to equal 0, like Java.
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:39



















0














If you want to get the same result with constants in Java as with variables, you need to pass 304 as a long constant with 304L, like this:



System.out.println(304L>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(304L>>(4*8)));


The reason is that you cannot shift an int with 4*8=32 bits; Java will shift 32 modulo 32 = zero buts, since an int is only 32 bits long.



Javascript, in constrast, doesn't support shifting 64-bit integers with the >> operator; it treats every number that you pass to >> as a 32-bit integer.



You could write your own function that does something similar:



function rshift(num, bits) {
return Math.round(num / Math.pow(2,bits));
}

console.log(rshift(304, 4*8))





share|improve this answer





















  • The rshift almost worked. One of the calculations is 0*8 for bits, which gives a value of 304. The Java equivalent gives 48
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 14 '18 at 2:09










  • You're saying that the Java code System.out.println(304L >> (0*8)) gives you 48? Or that System.out.println(0xff & (304L >> (0*8)))? Gives you 48? Because the equivalent of the latter is console.log(0xff & rshift(304, 0*8)) and that outputs 48 in Javascript too.
    – Erwin Bolwidt
    Nov 14 '18 at 2:52











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53291811%2fjava-hex-calculation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














The JLS, Section 15.19 covers shifting operators in Java.




If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is int, then only the five lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & (§15.22.1) with the mask value 0x1f (0b11111). The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range 0 to 31, inclusive.




For an int value such as 304, the bit shift value of 4*8, or 32, is really 0, so no shifting takes place. Then a bit-and with 0xFF yields 48.




If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is long, then only the six lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & (§15.22.1) with the mask value 0x3f (0b111111). The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range 0 to 63, inclusive.




For a long value, the bit shift value of 4*8 really does shift to the right 32 bits, which yields 0.



This page covers JavaScript bit-shift operators.




Bitwise operators treat their operands as a sequence of 32 bits (zeroes and ones), rather than as decimal, hexadecimal, or octal numbers.




It appears that JavaScript converts the number to a 32-bit number, like a Java int. It also appears that the same "only the least 5 bits" rule applies to the shift operand in JavaScript also.






console.log(304>>32);        // Don't shift!
console.log(0xFF&(304>>32)); // Don't shift!
console.log(304>>33); // Shift by 1, not 33
console.log(0xFF&(304>>33)); // Shift by 1, not 33








share|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for the answer, I'll check out the JavaScript bit-shift operators. I need the JavaScript to equal 0, like Java.
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:39
















3














The JLS, Section 15.19 covers shifting operators in Java.




If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is int, then only the five lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & (§15.22.1) with the mask value 0x1f (0b11111). The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range 0 to 31, inclusive.




For an int value such as 304, the bit shift value of 4*8, or 32, is really 0, so no shifting takes place. Then a bit-and with 0xFF yields 48.




If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is long, then only the six lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & (§15.22.1) with the mask value 0x3f (0b111111). The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range 0 to 63, inclusive.




For a long value, the bit shift value of 4*8 really does shift to the right 32 bits, which yields 0.



This page covers JavaScript bit-shift operators.




Bitwise operators treat their operands as a sequence of 32 bits (zeroes and ones), rather than as decimal, hexadecimal, or octal numbers.




It appears that JavaScript converts the number to a 32-bit number, like a Java int. It also appears that the same "only the least 5 bits" rule applies to the shift operand in JavaScript also.






console.log(304>>32);        // Don't shift!
console.log(0xFF&(304>>32)); // Don't shift!
console.log(304>>33); // Shift by 1, not 33
console.log(0xFF&(304>>33)); // Shift by 1, not 33








share|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for the answer, I'll check out the JavaScript bit-shift operators. I need the JavaScript to equal 0, like Java.
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:39














3












3








3






The JLS, Section 15.19 covers shifting operators in Java.




If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is int, then only the five lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & (§15.22.1) with the mask value 0x1f (0b11111). The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range 0 to 31, inclusive.




For an int value such as 304, the bit shift value of 4*8, or 32, is really 0, so no shifting takes place. Then a bit-and with 0xFF yields 48.




If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is long, then only the six lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & (§15.22.1) with the mask value 0x3f (0b111111). The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range 0 to 63, inclusive.




For a long value, the bit shift value of 4*8 really does shift to the right 32 bits, which yields 0.



This page covers JavaScript bit-shift operators.




Bitwise operators treat their operands as a sequence of 32 bits (zeroes and ones), rather than as decimal, hexadecimal, or octal numbers.




It appears that JavaScript converts the number to a 32-bit number, like a Java int. It also appears that the same "only the least 5 bits" rule applies to the shift operand in JavaScript also.






console.log(304>>32);        // Don't shift!
console.log(0xFF&(304>>32)); // Don't shift!
console.log(304>>33); // Shift by 1, not 33
console.log(0xFF&(304>>33)); // Shift by 1, not 33








share|improve this answer












The JLS, Section 15.19 covers shifting operators in Java.




If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is int, then only the five lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & (§15.22.1) with the mask value 0x1f (0b11111). The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range 0 to 31, inclusive.




For an int value such as 304, the bit shift value of 4*8, or 32, is really 0, so no shifting takes place. Then a bit-and with 0xFF yields 48.




If the promoted type of the left-hand operand is long, then only the six lowest-order bits of the right-hand operand are used as the shift distance. It is as if the right-hand operand were subjected to a bitwise logical AND operator & (§15.22.1) with the mask value 0x3f (0b111111). The shift distance actually used is therefore always in the range 0 to 63, inclusive.




For a long value, the bit shift value of 4*8 really does shift to the right 32 bits, which yields 0.



This page covers JavaScript bit-shift operators.




Bitwise operators treat their operands as a sequence of 32 bits (zeroes and ones), rather than as decimal, hexadecimal, or octal numbers.




It appears that JavaScript converts the number to a 32-bit number, like a Java int. It also appears that the same "only the least 5 bits" rule applies to the shift operand in JavaScript also.






console.log(304>>32);        // Don't shift!
console.log(0xFF&(304>>32)); // Don't shift!
console.log(304>>33); // Shift by 1, not 33
console.log(0xFF&(304>>33)); // Shift by 1, not 33








console.log(304>>32);        // Don't shift!
console.log(0xFF&(304>>32)); // Don't shift!
console.log(304>>33); // Shift by 1, not 33
console.log(0xFF&(304>>33)); // Shift by 1, not 33





console.log(304>>32);        // Don't shift!
console.log(0xFF&(304>>32)); // Don't shift!
console.log(304>>33); // Shift by 1, not 33
console.log(0xFF&(304>>33)); // Shift by 1, not 33






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 '18 at 1:30









rgettman

148k21203287




148k21203287












  • Thanks for the answer, I'll check out the JavaScript bit-shift operators. I need the JavaScript to equal 0, like Java.
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:39


















  • Thanks for the answer, I'll check out the JavaScript bit-shift operators. I need the JavaScript to equal 0, like Java.
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 14 '18 at 1:39
















Thanks for the answer, I'll check out the JavaScript bit-shift operators. I need the JavaScript to equal 0, like Java.
– Dan James Palmer
Nov 14 '18 at 1:39




Thanks for the answer, I'll check out the JavaScript bit-shift operators. I need the JavaScript to equal 0, like Java.
– Dan James Palmer
Nov 14 '18 at 1:39













0














If you want to get the same result with constants in Java as with variables, you need to pass 304 as a long constant with 304L, like this:



System.out.println(304L>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(304L>>(4*8)));


The reason is that you cannot shift an int with 4*8=32 bits; Java will shift 32 modulo 32 = zero buts, since an int is only 32 bits long.



Javascript, in constrast, doesn't support shifting 64-bit integers with the >> operator; it treats every number that you pass to >> as a 32-bit integer.



You could write your own function that does something similar:



function rshift(num, bits) {
return Math.round(num / Math.pow(2,bits));
}

console.log(rshift(304, 4*8))





share|improve this answer





















  • The rshift almost worked. One of the calculations is 0*8 for bits, which gives a value of 304. The Java equivalent gives 48
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 14 '18 at 2:09










  • You're saying that the Java code System.out.println(304L >> (0*8)) gives you 48? Or that System.out.println(0xff & (304L >> (0*8)))? Gives you 48? Because the equivalent of the latter is console.log(0xff & rshift(304, 0*8)) and that outputs 48 in Javascript too.
    – Erwin Bolwidt
    Nov 14 '18 at 2:52
















0














If you want to get the same result with constants in Java as with variables, you need to pass 304 as a long constant with 304L, like this:



System.out.println(304L>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(304L>>(4*8)));


The reason is that you cannot shift an int with 4*8=32 bits; Java will shift 32 modulo 32 = zero buts, since an int is only 32 bits long.



Javascript, in constrast, doesn't support shifting 64-bit integers with the >> operator; it treats every number that you pass to >> as a 32-bit integer.



You could write your own function that does something similar:



function rshift(num, bits) {
return Math.round(num / Math.pow(2,bits));
}

console.log(rshift(304, 4*8))





share|improve this answer





















  • The rshift almost worked. One of the calculations is 0*8 for bits, which gives a value of 304. The Java equivalent gives 48
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 14 '18 at 2:09










  • You're saying that the Java code System.out.println(304L >> (0*8)) gives you 48? Or that System.out.println(0xff & (304L >> (0*8)))? Gives you 48? Because the equivalent of the latter is console.log(0xff & rshift(304, 0*8)) and that outputs 48 in Javascript too.
    – Erwin Bolwidt
    Nov 14 '18 at 2:52














0












0








0






If you want to get the same result with constants in Java as with variables, you need to pass 304 as a long constant with 304L, like this:



System.out.println(304L>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(304L>>(4*8)));


The reason is that you cannot shift an int with 4*8=32 bits; Java will shift 32 modulo 32 = zero buts, since an int is only 32 bits long.



Javascript, in constrast, doesn't support shifting 64-bit integers with the >> operator; it treats every number that you pass to >> as a 32-bit integer.



You could write your own function that does something similar:



function rshift(num, bits) {
return Math.round(num / Math.pow(2,bits));
}

console.log(rshift(304, 4*8))





share|improve this answer












If you want to get the same result with constants in Java as with variables, you need to pass 304 as a long constant with 304L, like this:



System.out.println(304L>>(4*8));
System.out.println(0xFF&(304L>>(4*8)));


The reason is that you cannot shift an int with 4*8=32 bits; Java will shift 32 modulo 32 = zero buts, since an int is only 32 bits long.



Javascript, in constrast, doesn't support shifting 64-bit integers with the >> operator; it treats every number that you pass to >> as a 32-bit integer.



You could write your own function that does something similar:



function rshift(num, bits) {
return Math.round(num / Math.pow(2,bits));
}

console.log(rshift(304, 4*8))






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 '18 at 1:32









Erwin Bolwidt

23.8k123858




23.8k123858












  • The rshift almost worked. One of the calculations is 0*8 for bits, which gives a value of 304. The Java equivalent gives 48
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 14 '18 at 2:09










  • You're saying that the Java code System.out.println(304L >> (0*8)) gives you 48? Or that System.out.println(0xff & (304L >> (0*8)))? Gives you 48? Because the equivalent of the latter is console.log(0xff & rshift(304, 0*8)) and that outputs 48 in Javascript too.
    – Erwin Bolwidt
    Nov 14 '18 at 2:52


















  • The rshift almost worked. One of the calculations is 0*8 for bits, which gives a value of 304. The Java equivalent gives 48
    – Dan James Palmer
    Nov 14 '18 at 2:09










  • You're saying that the Java code System.out.println(304L >> (0*8)) gives you 48? Or that System.out.println(0xff & (304L >> (0*8)))? Gives you 48? Because the equivalent of the latter is console.log(0xff & rshift(304, 0*8)) and that outputs 48 in Javascript too.
    – Erwin Bolwidt
    Nov 14 '18 at 2:52
















The rshift almost worked. One of the calculations is 0*8 for bits, which gives a value of 304. The Java equivalent gives 48
– Dan James Palmer
Nov 14 '18 at 2:09




The rshift almost worked. One of the calculations is 0*8 for bits, which gives a value of 304. The Java equivalent gives 48
– Dan James Palmer
Nov 14 '18 at 2:09












You're saying that the Java code System.out.println(304L >> (0*8)) gives you 48? Or that System.out.println(0xff & (304L >> (0*8)))? Gives you 48? Because the equivalent of the latter is console.log(0xff & rshift(304, 0*8)) and that outputs 48 in Javascript too.
– Erwin Bolwidt
Nov 14 '18 at 2:52




You're saying that the Java code System.out.println(304L >> (0*8)) gives you 48? Or that System.out.println(0xff & (304L >> (0*8)))? Gives you 48? Because the equivalent of the latter is console.log(0xff & rshift(304, 0*8)) and that outputs 48 in Javascript too.
– Erwin Bolwidt
Nov 14 '18 at 2:52


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53291811%2fjava-hex-calculation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

鏡平學校

ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?