How do you calculate interquartile range (IQR) correctly using Python?












3















I am trying to understand the way to compute iqr (interquartile range).



according this, this and this, I tried 3 solutions to do this.



solution_1



a = numpy.array([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7])
q1_a = numpy.percentile(a, 25)
q3_a = numpy.percentile(a, 75)
q3_a - q1_a


solution_2



from scipy.stats import iqr
iqr(a)


solution_3



q1_am = np.median(numpy.array([1, 2, 3, 4]))
q3_am = np.median(numpy.array([4, 5, 6, 7]))
q3_am - q1_am


3 of them give the same result 3 which is correct.



when I tried another set of numbers, things were going weird.



both solution_1 and 2 output 0.95 which is not correct.



x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
q1_x = numpy.percentile(x, 25)
q3_x = numpy.percentile(x, 75)
q3_x - q1_x


solution_3 gives 1.2 which is correct



q1_xm = np.median(np.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7,7.25]))
q3_xm = np.median(np.array([7.25,7.4, 7.9, 8.1]))
q3_xm - q1_xm


What am I missing with the solutions?



any clue would be appreciated.










share|improve this question





























    3















    I am trying to understand the way to compute iqr (interquartile range).



    according this, this and this, I tried 3 solutions to do this.



    solution_1



    a = numpy.array([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7])
    q1_a = numpy.percentile(a, 25)
    q3_a = numpy.percentile(a, 75)
    q3_a - q1_a


    solution_2



    from scipy.stats import iqr
    iqr(a)


    solution_3



    q1_am = np.median(numpy.array([1, 2, 3, 4]))
    q3_am = np.median(numpy.array([4, 5, 6, 7]))
    q3_am - q1_am


    3 of them give the same result 3 which is correct.



    when I tried another set of numbers, things were going weird.



    both solution_1 and 2 output 0.95 which is not correct.



    x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
    q1_x = numpy.percentile(x, 25)
    q3_x = numpy.percentile(x, 75)
    q3_x - q1_x


    solution_3 gives 1.2 which is correct



    q1_xm = np.median(np.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7,7.25]))
    q3_xm = np.median(np.array([7.25,7.4, 7.9, 8.1]))
    q3_xm - q1_xm


    What am I missing with the solutions?



    any clue would be appreciated.










    share|improve this question



























      3












      3








      3








      I am trying to understand the way to compute iqr (interquartile range).



      according this, this and this, I tried 3 solutions to do this.



      solution_1



      a = numpy.array([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7])
      q1_a = numpy.percentile(a, 25)
      q3_a = numpy.percentile(a, 75)
      q3_a - q1_a


      solution_2



      from scipy.stats import iqr
      iqr(a)


      solution_3



      q1_am = np.median(numpy.array([1, 2, 3, 4]))
      q3_am = np.median(numpy.array([4, 5, 6, 7]))
      q3_am - q1_am


      3 of them give the same result 3 which is correct.



      when I tried another set of numbers, things were going weird.



      both solution_1 and 2 output 0.95 which is not correct.



      x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
      q1_x = numpy.percentile(x, 25)
      q3_x = numpy.percentile(x, 75)
      q3_x - q1_x


      solution_3 gives 1.2 which is correct



      q1_xm = np.median(np.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7,7.25]))
      q3_xm = np.median(np.array([7.25,7.4, 7.9, 8.1]))
      q3_xm - q1_xm


      What am I missing with the solutions?



      any clue would be appreciated.










      share|improve this question
















      I am trying to understand the way to compute iqr (interquartile range).



      according this, this and this, I tried 3 solutions to do this.



      solution_1



      a = numpy.array([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7])
      q1_a = numpy.percentile(a, 25)
      q3_a = numpy.percentile(a, 75)
      q3_a - q1_a


      solution_2



      from scipy.stats import iqr
      iqr(a)


      solution_3



      q1_am = np.median(numpy.array([1, 2, 3, 4]))
      q3_am = np.median(numpy.array([4, 5, 6, 7]))
      q3_am - q1_am


      3 of them give the same result 3 which is correct.



      when I tried another set of numbers, things were going weird.



      both solution_1 and 2 output 0.95 which is not correct.



      x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
      q1_x = numpy.percentile(x, 25)
      q3_x = numpy.percentile(x, 75)
      q3_x - q1_x


      solution_3 gives 1.2 which is correct



      q1_xm = np.median(np.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7,7.25]))
      q3_xm = np.median(np.array([7.25,7.4, 7.9, 8.1]))
      q3_xm - q1_xm


      What am I missing with the solutions?



      any clue would be appreciated.







      python numpy scipy






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 16 '18 at 12:50









      tel

      6,40321430




      6,40321430










      asked Nov 16 '18 at 11:54









      czlswsczlsws

      233




      233
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          You'll get your expected result with numpy.percentile if you set interpolation=midpoint:



          x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
          q1_x = numpy.percentile(x, 25, interpolation='midpoint')
          q3_x = numpy.percentile(x, 75, interpolation='midpoint')
          print(q3_x - q1_x)


          This outputs:



          1.2000000000000002


          Setting interpolation=midpoint also makes scipy.stats.iqr give the result you wanted:



          from scipy.stats import iqr

          x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
          print(iqr(x, rng=(25,75), interpolation='midpoint'))


          which outputs:



          1.2000000000000002


          See the interpolation parameter in the linked docs for more info on what the option actually does.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53337391%2fhow-do-you-calculate-interquartile-range-iqr-correctly-using-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            You'll get your expected result with numpy.percentile if you set interpolation=midpoint:



            x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
            q1_x = numpy.percentile(x, 25, interpolation='midpoint')
            q3_x = numpy.percentile(x, 75, interpolation='midpoint')
            print(q3_x - q1_x)


            This outputs:



            1.2000000000000002


            Setting interpolation=midpoint also makes scipy.stats.iqr give the result you wanted:



            from scipy.stats import iqr

            x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
            print(iqr(x, rng=(25,75), interpolation='midpoint'))


            which outputs:



            1.2000000000000002


            See the interpolation parameter in the linked docs for more info on what the option actually does.






            share|improve this answer




























              0














              You'll get your expected result with numpy.percentile if you set interpolation=midpoint:



              x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
              q1_x = numpy.percentile(x, 25, interpolation='midpoint')
              q3_x = numpy.percentile(x, 75, interpolation='midpoint')
              print(q3_x - q1_x)


              This outputs:



              1.2000000000000002


              Setting interpolation=midpoint also makes scipy.stats.iqr give the result you wanted:



              from scipy.stats import iqr

              x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
              print(iqr(x, rng=(25,75), interpolation='midpoint'))


              which outputs:



              1.2000000000000002


              See the interpolation parameter in the linked docs for more info on what the option actually does.






              share|improve this answer


























                0












                0








                0







                You'll get your expected result with numpy.percentile if you set interpolation=midpoint:



                x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
                q1_x = numpy.percentile(x, 25, interpolation='midpoint')
                q3_x = numpy.percentile(x, 75, interpolation='midpoint')
                print(q3_x - q1_x)


                This outputs:



                1.2000000000000002


                Setting interpolation=midpoint also makes scipy.stats.iqr give the result you wanted:



                from scipy.stats import iqr

                x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
                print(iqr(x, rng=(25,75), interpolation='midpoint'))


                which outputs:



                1.2000000000000002


                See the interpolation parameter in the linked docs for more info on what the option actually does.






                share|improve this answer













                You'll get your expected result with numpy.percentile if you set interpolation=midpoint:



                x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
                q1_x = numpy.percentile(x, 25, interpolation='midpoint')
                q3_x = numpy.percentile(x, 75, interpolation='midpoint')
                print(q3_x - q1_x)


                This outputs:



                1.2000000000000002


                Setting interpolation=midpoint also makes scipy.stats.iqr give the result you wanted:



                from scipy.stats import iqr

                x = numpy.array([4.1, 6.2, 6.7, 7.1, 7.4, 7.4, 7.9, 8.1])
                print(iqr(x, rng=(25,75), interpolation='midpoint'))


                which outputs:



                1.2000000000000002


                See the interpolation parameter in the linked docs for more info on what the option actually does.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 16 '18 at 12:44









                teltel

                6,40321430




                6,40321430






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53337391%2fhow-do-you-calculate-interquartile-range-iqr-correctly-using-python%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    鏡平學校

                    ꓛꓣだゔៀៅຸ໢ທຮ໕໒ ,ໂ'໥໓າ໼ឨឲ៵៭ៈゎゔit''䖳𥁄卿' ☨₤₨こゎもょの;ꜹꟚꞖꞵꟅꞛေၦေɯ,ɨɡ𛃵𛁹ޝ޳ޠ޾,ޤޒޯ޾𫝒𫠁သ𛅤チョ'サノބޘދ𛁐ᶿᶇᶀᶋᶠ㨑㽹⻮ꧬ꧹؍۩وَؠ㇕㇃㇪ ㇦㇋㇋ṜẰᵡᴠ 軌ᵕ搜۳ٰޗޮ޷ސޯ𫖾𫅀ल, ꙭ꙰ꚅꙁꚊꞻꝔ꟠Ꝭㄤﺟޱސꧨꧼ꧴ꧯꧽ꧲ꧯ'⽹⽭⾁⿞⼳⽋២៩ញណើꩯꩤ꩸ꩮᶻᶺᶧᶂ𫳲𫪭𬸄𫵰𬖩𬫣𬊉ၲ𛅬㕦䬺𫝌𫝼,,𫟖𫞽ហៅ஫㆔ాఆఅꙒꚞꙍ,Ꙟ꙱エ ,ポテ,フࢰࢯ𫟠𫞶 𫝤𫟠ﺕﹱﻜﻣ𪵕𪭸𪻆𪾩𫔷ġ,ŧآꞪ꟥,ꞔꝻ♚☹⛵𛀌ꬷꭞȄƁƪƬșƦǙǗdžƝǯǧⱦⱰꓕꓢႋ神 ဴ၀க௭எ௫ឫោ ' េㇷㇴㇼ神ㇸㇲㇽㇴㇼㇻㇸ'ㇸㇿㇸㇹㇰㆣꓚꓤ₡₧ ㄨㄟ㄂ㄖㄎ໗ツڒذ₶।ऩछएोञयूटक़कयँृी,冬'𛅢𛅥ㇱㇵㇶ𥄥𦒽𠣧𠊓𧢖𥞘𩔋цѰㄠſtʯʭɿʆʗʍʩɷɛ,əʏダヵㄐㄘR{gỚṖḺờṠṫảḙḭᴮᵏᴘᵀᵷᵕᴜᴏᵾq﮲ﲿﴽﭙ軌ﰬﶚﶧ﫲Ҝжюїкӈㇴffצּ﬘﭅﬈軌'ffistfflſtffतभफɳɰʊɲʎ𛁱𛁖𛁮𛀉 𛂯𛀞నఋŀŲ 𫟲𫠖𫞺ຆຆ ໹້໕໗ๆทԊꧢꧠ꧰ꓱ⿝⼑ŎḬẃẖỐẅ ,ờỰỈỗﮊDžȩꭏꭎꬻ꭮ꬿꭖꭥꭅ㇭神 ⾈ꓵꓑ⺄㄄ㄪㄙㄅㄇstA۵䞽ॶ𫞑𫝄㇉㇇゜軌𩜛𩳠Jﻺ‚Üမ႕ႌႊၐၸဓၞၞၡ៸wyvtᶎᶪᶹစဎ꣡꣰꣢꣤ٗ؋لㇳㇾㇻㇱ㆐㆔,,㆟Ⱶヤマފ޼ޝަݿݞݠݷݐ',ݘ,ݪݙݵ𬝉𬜁𫝨𫞘くせぉて¼óû×ó£…𛅑הㄙくԗԀ5606神45,神796'𪤻𫞧ꓐ㄁ㄘɥɺꓵꓲ3''7034׉ⱦⱠˆ“𫝋ȍ,ꩲ軌꩷ꩶꩧꩫఞ۔فڱێظペサ神ナᴦᵑ47 9238їﻂ䐊䔉㠸﬎ffiﬣ,לּᴷᴦᵛᵽ,ᴨᵤ ᵸᵥᴗᵈꚏꚉꚟ⻆rtǟƴ𬎎

                    Why https connections are so slow when debugging (stepping over) in Java?