How accurate is Vuforia Fusion compared with “pure” ARCore / ARKit?
I'm experimenting with Vuforia Fusion to be able to track an object and then use its new extended tracking system (which should use ARCore/ARKit if available) to track the detected object in space.
The problem is, no matter what settings I set, no matter even if I place the .aar ARCore plugin inside the Plugins > Android folder in the Unity editor (as mentioned in the Vuforia guidelines to integrate ARCore), the tracking will always be very inaccurate compared with the ARCore implementation without Vuforia.
I'm wondering if Vuforia Fusion really uses ARCore, because, as I said before, even if I don't put the .aar ARCore plugin inside the Plugins > Android folder, Vuforia Fusion still returns me that I'm using the PLATFORM_SENSOR_FUSION (aka ARCore).
Does anyone experienced the same behaviour? Or did you have different results?
Thanks in advance and have a nice day.
unity3d augmented-reality arkit vuforia arcore
asked Nov 13 at 16:51
Frank
296
|
show 2 more comments
I'm experimenting with Vuforia Fusion to be able to track an object and then use its new extended tracking system (which should use ARCore/ARKit if available) to track the detected object in space.
The problem is, no matter what settings I set, no matter even if I place the .aar ARCore plugin inside the Plugins > Android folder in the Unity editor (as mentioned in the Vuforia guidelines to integrate ARCore), the tracking will always be very inaccurate compared with the ARCore implementation without Vuforia.
I'm wondering if Vuforia Fusion really uses ARCore, because, as I said before, even if I don't put the .aar ARCore plugin inside the Plugins > Android folder, Vuforia Fusion still returns me that I'm using the PLATFORM_SENSOR_FUSION (aka ARCore).
Does anyone experienced the same behaviour? Or did you have different results?
Thanks in advance and have a nice day.
unity3d augmented-reality arkit vuforia arcore
asked Nov 13 at 16:51
Frank
296
I have tested it for understanding tracking status and i have found some inconsistent behavior as well. For example, what i found was when you use fusion type as PLATFORM_SENSOR_FUSION you can not recover when you lose tracking even though this is a feature from ARCore. Also you can recover with VUFORIA_SENSOR_FUSION which they claim is error prone. I asked a [question] (stackoverflow.com/questions/52778945/…) about this as well but can not get an answer.
– Ali Kanat
Nov 13 at 17:27
I hope that my answer to this SO question could be somewhat useful for you: stackoverflow.com/questions/50811770/…
– ARGeo
Nov 13 at 21:29
@alikanat thank you for your reply, maybe your problem could be related to mine in some way, hope you'll get an answer
– Frank
Nov 14 at 8:16
@ARGeo thank you for your answer, unfortunately I already found your question and read all the answer but I didn't found mentions to the Vuforia imprecisions compared to ARCore (even though it is mentioned that ARKit is more accurate)
– Frank
Nov 14 at 8:18
Almost all of Vuforia's features are near-similar to ARCore. And it is incorrect to compare Vuforia and ARCore. I suppose any comparison is subjective.
– ARGeo
Nov 14 at 9:16
|
show 2 more comments
I'm experimenting with Vuforia Fusion to be able to track an object and then use its new extended tracking system (which should use ARCore/ARKit if available) to track the detected object in space.
The problem is, no matter what settings I set, no matter even if I place the .aar ARCore plugin inside the Plugins > Android folder in the Unity editor (as mentioned in the Vuforia guidelines to integrate ARCore), the tracking will always be very inaccurate compared with the ARCore implementation without Vuforia.
I'm wondering if Vuforia Fusion really uses ARCore, because, as I said before, even if I don't put the .aar ARCore plugin inside the Plugins > Android folder, Vuforia Fusion still returns me that I'm using the PLATFORM_SENSOR_FUSION (aka ARCore).
Does anyone experienced the same behaviour? Or did you have different results?
Thanks in advance and have a nice day.
unity3d augmented-reality arkit vuforia arcore
asked Nov 13 at 16:51
Frank
296
I'm experimenting with Vuforia Fusion to be able to track an object and then use its new extended tracking system (which should use ARCore/ARKit if available) to track the detected object in space.
The problem is, no matter what settings I set, no matter even if I place the .aar ARCore plugin inside the Plugins > Android folder in the Unity editor (as mentioned in the Vuforia guidelines to integrate ARCore), the tracking will always be very inaccurate compared with the ARCore implementation without Vuforia.
I'm wondering if Vuforia Fusion really uses ARCore, because, as I said before, even if I don't put the .aar ARCore plugin inside the Plugins > Android folder, Vuforia Fusion still returns me that I'm using the PLATFORM_SENSOR_FUSION (aka ARCore).
Does anyone experienced the same behaviour? Or did you have different results?
Thanks in advance and have a nice day.
unity3d augmented-reality arkit vuforia arcore
unity3d augmented-reality arkit vuforia arcore
asked Nov 13 at 16:51
Frank
296
asked Nov 13 at 16:51
Frank
296
asked Nov 13 at 16:51
Frank
296
asked Nov 13 at 16:51
Frank
296
asked Nov 13 at 16:51
Frank
296
296
I have tested it for understanding tracking status and i have found some inconsistent behavior as well. For example, what i found was when you use fusion type as PLATFORM_SENSOR_FUSION you can not recover when you lose tracking even though this is a feature from ARCore. Also you can recover with VUFORIA_SENSOR_FUSION which they claim is error prone. I asked a [question] (stackoverflow.com/questions/52778945/…) about this as well but can not get an answer.
– Ali Kanat
Nov 13 at 17:27
I hope that my answer to this SO question could be somewhat useful for you: stackoverflow.com/questions/50811770/…
– ARGeo
Nov 13 at 21:29
@alikanat thank you for your reply, maybe your problem could be related to mine in some way, hope you'll get an answer
– Frank
Nov 14 at 8:16
@ARGeo thank you for your answer, unfortunately I already found your question and read all the answer but I didn't found mentions to the Vuforia imprecisions compared to ARCore (even though it is mentioned that ARKit is more accurate)
– Frank
Nov 14 at 8:18
Almost all of Vuforia's features are near-similar to ARCore. And it is incorrect to compare Vuforia and ARCore. I suppose any comparison is subjective.
– ARGeo
Nov 14 at 9:16
|
show 2 more comments
I have tested it for understanding tracking status and i have found some inconsistent behavior as well. For example, what i found was when you use fusion type as PLATFORM_SENSOR_FUSION you can not recover when you lose tracking even though this is a feature from ARCore. Also you can recover with VUFORIA_SENSOR_FUSION which they claim is error prone. I asked a [question] (stackoverflow.com/questions/52778945/…) about this as well but can not get an answer.
– Ali Kanat
Nov 13 at 17:27
I hope that my answer to this SO question could be somewhat useful for you: stackoverflow.com/questions/50811770/…
– ARGeo
Nov 13 at 21:29
@alikanat thank you for your reply, maybe your problem could be related to mine in some way, hope you'll get an answer
– Frank
Nov 14 at 8:16
@ARGeo thank you for your answer, unfortunately I already found your question and read all the answer but I didn't found mentions to the Vuforia imprecisions compared to ARCore (even though it is mentioned that ARKit is more accurate)
– Frank
Nov 14 at 8:18
Almost all of Vuforia's features are near-similar to ARCore. And it is incorrect to compare Vuforia and ARCore. I suppose any comparison is subjective.
– ARGeo
Nov 14 at 9:16
I have tested it for understanding tracking status and i have found some inconsistent behavior as well. For example, what i found was when you use fusion type as PLATFORM_SENSOR_FUSION you can not recover when you lose tracking even though this is a feature from ARCore. Also you can recover with VUFORIA_SENSOR_FUSION which they claim is error prone. I asked a [question] (stackoverflow.com/questions/52778945/…) about this as well but can not get an answer.
– Ali Kanat
Nov 13 at 17:27
I have tested it for understanding tracking status and i have found some inconsistent behavior as well. For example, what i found was when you use fusion type as PLATFORM_SENSOR_FUSION you can not recover when you lose tracking even though this is a feature from ARCore. Also you can recover with VUFORIA_SENSOR_FUSION which they claim is error prone. I asked a [question] (stackoverflow.com/questions/52778945/…) about this as well but can not get an answer.
– Ali Kanat
Nov 13 at 17:27
I hope that my answer to this SO question could be somewhat useful for you: stackoverflow.com/questions/50811770/…
– ARGeo
Nov 13 at 21:29
I hope that my answer to this SO question could be somewhat useful for you: stackoverflow.com/questions/50811770/…
– ARGeo
Nov 13 at 21:29
@alikanat thank you for your reply, maybe your problem could be related to mine in some way, hope you'll get an answer
– Frank
Nov 14 at 8:16
@alikanat thank you for your reply, maybe your problem could be related to mine in some way, hope you'll get an answer
– Frank
Nov 14 at 8:16
@ARGeo thank you for your answer, unfortunately I already found your question and read all the answer but I didn't found mentions to the Vuforia imprecisions compared to ARCore (even though it is mentioned that ARKit is more accurate)
– Frank
Nov 14 at 8:18
@ARGeo thank you for your answer, unfortunately I already found your question and read all the answer but I didn't found mentions to the Vuforia imprecisions compared to ARCore (even though it is mentioned that ARKit is more accurate)
– Frank
Nov 14 at 8:18
Almost all of Vuforia's features are near-similar to ARCore. And it is incorrect to compare Vuforia and ARCore. I suppose any comparison is subjective.
– ARGeo
Nov 14 at 9:16
Almost all of Vuforia's features are near-similar to ARCore. And it is incorrect to compare Vuforia and ARCore. I suppose any comparison is subjective.
– ARGeo
Nov 14 at 9:16
|
show 2 more comments
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53285888%2fhow-accurate-is-vuforia-fusion-compared-with-pure-arcore-arkit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53285888%2fhow-accurate-is-vuforia-fusion-compared-with-pure-arcore-arkit%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I have tested it for understanding tracking status and i have found some inconsistent behavior as well. For example, what i found was when you use fusion type as PLATFORM_SENSOR_FUSION you can not recover when you lose tracking even though this is a feature from ARCore. Also you can recover with VUFORIA_SENSOR_FUSION which they claim is error prone. I asked a [question] (stackoverflow.com/questions/52778945/…) about this as well but can not get an answer.
– Ali Kanat
Nov 13 at 17:27
I hope that my answer to this SO question could be somewhat useful for you: stackoverflow.com/questions/50811770/…
– ARGeo
Nov 13 at 21:29
@alikanat thank you for your reply, maybe your problem could be related to mine in some way, hope you'll get an answer
– Frank
Nov 14 at 8:16
@ARGeo thank you for your answer, unfortunately I already found your question and read all the answer but I didn't found mentions to the Vuforia imprecisions compared to ARCore (even though it is mentioned that ARKit is more accurate)
– Frank
Nov 14 at 8:18
Almost all of Vuforia's features are near-similar to ARCore. And it is incorrect to compare Vuforia and ARCore. I suppose any comparison is subjective.
– ARGeo
Nov 14 at 9:16